Hi, there's another empty node here: node/7567359962

In such cases please add fixme=continue to the last node and describe this issue in a note key, allowing other mappers to see the reason you didn't continue the way.

The road skeleton is not the same, it has been changed and is now more of a curvy path than a sharp right and left turn. IMO this is clearly visible when comparing the different aerial imagery. Also you didn't continue the service road until the end, which is something I often see from Amazon, unfortunately.

I've fixed this with changeset/86141736.

Moin,

Bei der inscription habe ich (u.A.) ein paar Tippfehler korrigiert:

Güther -> Günter
Westpf. -> Westf.

Das ist jedenfalls das, was ich glaube, auf deinem Foto zu lesen :)

Und ich hab mal ein cemetery=grave daraus gemacht, da es sich offenbar um ein Einzelgrab und keinen Friedhof handelt.

Gruß

Super, danke dir!

Hallo Oslet,

ich glaube, du hast teilweise die indoor Tags vergessen. Sieht auch auf der osm.org Karte jetzt etwas komisch aus, da sind z.B. Treppen "auf dem Gebäude" :P

Hello, why did you not draw this service road until the end, as the aerial imagery shows this road extends further (to house number 11)?

Hello, you've used the Bing aerial imagery here. Please always check different aerial imagery and if they show different on-ground situations, try to figure out which one is the latest.

In this case, PDOK, Esri and Maxar show a newer situation compared to the outdated Bing imagery. As such, the way you created is a little inaccurate.

Probably better not to, as a node usually identifies a single feature. A renderer or map application might end up just recognize this as a tree and disregard the swing part, which is definitely of more interest than a single tree inside a forest.

If you want to map the tree, you could place a natural=tree node just next to the swing.

I don't think there's a key for swings in trees, but swings in general can be mapped with playground=swing

I agree it does look like a gate on aerial imagery, but the path you created only goes half way to the gate, so you should have either connected it to just the parking lot and stop there, or extended the path to the gate, not halfway over the parking lot and stop somewhere in the middle of it.

I've edited this area and corrected it.

Also I just noticed you're about to hit your 10000th edit! Congrats and thank you for all the work you did!

Hi Jeroen, looks like you created an empty node here: node/7548499566

Hallo Melloc,

ich habe deine Änderung hier (changeset/85910859) rückgängig gemacht, weil alle 3 von dir angelegten Einträge bereits direkt neben den von dir bearbeiteten Objekten existierten. Insbesondere der Judi Markt liegt ein Haus neben dem, das du bearbeitet hast und ist auch bereits eingetragen.

Thanks thadad, LGTM now!

Looks good now, thanks for fixing.

Hi, thanks for editing the gate.

There are a few parking spaces in front of the main building towards the road and in front of two smaller buildings at the back. But there is no parking aisle. And the marked parking spaces don't make the ground they're placed on a road. There are no road markings or a different surface that would mark a road on the school yard that's ~15 meters between the parking spaces and the main building. 15 meters is too wide for a "road" if there are no markings at all. You could just as well do a loop around the main building, so if the school yard would be regarded as a road, you'd need to map the thing as a loop that goes around the main building (please don't).

But really, it isn't a road.

You can move freely and take any route on the school yard because it's more of a pedestrian area than a road.

Hallo Marco und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich gehe davon aus, dass die CDU nicht das gesamte Haus einnimmt, sondern nur einer von mehreren Mietern ist? Sieht von außen vorrangig nach einem Wohnhaus aus.

Dann sollte office=political_party als einzelner Punkt im Haus platziert werden und nicht das gesamte Haus als Parteibüro deklariert werden.

Als name sollten nur anerkannte Namen verwendet werden, "Karl-Arnold-Haus der CDU Aachen" als Name für dieses Gebäude dürfte außerhalb der CDU kaum Verwendung finden. Insbesondere dann, wenn das Haus gar nicht von der CDU ist.

Manchmal haben Häuser aber tatsächlich Namen, wie z.B. das Haus Grenzwacht am Bahnhofsplatz (way/35960684). Das kann dann über addr:housename festgehalten werden. Wäre aber in diesem Fall nicht richtig.

Gruß und viel Spaß beim Mappen!

Hi Salonik,

phone numbers should use the format as described on the wiki. In this case +49 241 46831061 (without the spaces in the last block).

See phone=*

Hello, this seems slightly off from where it should be. It's clearly visible when you select Esri World Imagery in iD and zoom in closely.

Currently the service road crosses a hedge next to the actual service road.

It should be moved 2-3 meters to south.