Xvtn's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 136106403 | over 2 years ago | You're right - that's my mistake. `import:merge` is a tag I was using internally for items where I was unsure if they could be merged with existing features using only assumptions made based on geometry/location. (The vast majority of features can be merged based on that assumption.) I should have removed that tag before uploading. I'll fix that asap. Also, I'm not sure how I missed the fact that I'm supposed to be linking to the documentation. It definitely makes sense to do that and I'll include it in future changesets. Documentation is here: osm.wiki/Utah/CacheValleyAddressImport |
| 135977767 | over 2 years ago | Oh no! They were my comments!! Sorry, I thought this was more of the previous type of edits combining prefix, etc. Thanks for reviewing this past work!! |
| 135977767 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions What comments are you referring to as your source? ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135749085 | over 2 years ago | Are you sure about these changes? I was here a while ago and talked to a nearby resident, they said public motor vehicle traffic is not allowed in that whole area. Has something changed? |
| 135749121 | over 2 years ago | Are you sure about these changes? I was here a while ago and talked to a nearby resident, they said public motor vehicle traffic is not allowed in that whole area. Has something changed? |
| 135691486 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135691664 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135692128 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135692170 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135696227 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135695801 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135693431 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135693152 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135692764 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135692491 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135692388 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 135696020 | over 2 years ago | These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc. |
| 134367367 | over 2 years ago | Is this a test edit? |
| 131119142 | almost 3 years ago | Nice additions, thanks! Seems like you definitely know the area. You can't get a lot of this stuff with armchair mapping. You probably already know of this, but in cleaning up the trails and stuff in the bear river range, I've found the Strava heatmap to be incredibly useful. You can add it as a layer, instructions here:
|
| 130762161 | almost 3 years ago | Oh, I hadn't noticed that payment:bitcoin=yes was already present here. I wondered if you were going around adding XBT to random nodes across the country! Thanks for the explanation. |