Because the footpath changes from one council to another ON the boundary, and has different references either side of the boundary. The exact admin boundary is the correct point for the footpath to split

corrected, thanks for highlighting this

It's a temporary construction compound that was itself under construction.
After the compound is constructed, it will be used to assist in the construction of nearby rail infrastructure.
After the construction phase of the rail infrastructure is completed, the land used by the construction compound will be returned to its previous use. If you can think of better tagging that is already used in Openstreetmap, please let me know.

I may have jumped the gun a bit. as of yesterday lunchtime, only one of the tracks had been connected. Not sure if they've done both yet.

corrected name and ref, thanks

you are correct. I've corrected name and ref of the STW

You are correct. I have updated name and ref accordingly.

you are correct. I've corrected the name of the STW and the ref

Market Information Publication spreadsheet.

Yes, it's a strange naming for these reports, but the waste water infrastructure companies have to publish the locations from where they might be able to supply farmers with biosolids from.
biosolids is the treated sludge that can be used with care to enrich the soil on farms.

you are correct. I have edited this STW name and ref

you are correct. I have edited the name and ref of the STW. Thank you for cross-checking these.

You are correct. I've edited the name and ref.

You are right, I've renamed it to Nunburnholme/No 3 STW
and corrected the ref

You are correct. My mistake. Corrected name and ref

The information I have from OFWAT and Yorkshire Water is that it's Aldfield/STW ref SAI00001615

https://www.yorkshirewater.com/environment/bioresources/

Of course, if you have better information from a site survey, please correct.

It's a new feature that a collection of charge points from the same provider has two different installations with different features at different locations on the same site. The pricing is different for the different facilities, so there needs to be some sort of obvious differentiation here. Yes. They probably should have more tags, which I'll get around to doing once I've further researched.

Ground truth is always the best. What does the sign on the gate say?
The reports the EU for the Wastewater treatment directive have came from the water companies and are should be reasonably accurate up to 2018.

Current Bing imagery of this area appears to be well aligned with nearby features from multiple data sources, GPX and other suitably-licenced maps.

Having looked at other GPS traces in the system, it looks like the current alignment is in the middle of the logged GPX tracks. As and when we get more data (GPX and imagery), we could perhaps improve it further.

fixed