Probable pokemon.

Changesets have been reverted.
Data deleted from past. I suspect some data has been dragged in the distant past to this location and then the new mapper has 'played with it'.

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

The administrative boundary for 'Fitzroy North' requires the tag 'boundary=administrative', I have reapplied that.

I have removed the way named 'MB Armistice 163-165R' from both admin boundaries 'Fitzroy' and 'Fitzroy North' as it plays no role in these admin boundaries.

Keep mapping, you will make mistakes as we all do particularly when starting out.

Some renders still show disused: ... I don't know about raised: disused means it can be easily put back into cation, raised means it gone.
Good luck.

Hi,
One of these trails is used for an administrative boundary. Your change broke that boundary. I have repaired the relation. Please take care with those administration boundaries if you can.

If these old tracks are still shown in the DCS Base Map then mappers may come along and reenter them. It might be better to leave them in OSM but retag them as disused:highway=track, abandoned:highway=track or even raised:highway=track. If they are still evident but 'closed' then used the access tag, access=no, access=private ...

The name tag is for the NAME only, not descriptions such as house, toilets.

See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hi,
I'd think it is time this message was removed...
"STORM DAMAGED INCL TREES - SES TAPE BLOCKS ENTRY 18/2/21"

Hi,

Muilpolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments with outer members..
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.42121&lat=-31.88760&zoom=18

I would simply map them as 3 separate buildings - no relation is required?

You learn, as did I.

Starting small, like this area helps. As does persistence.
Good luck.

Hi,
I think your 'making a bit of a mess' around relation the wood relation/2711873 among others.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.72779&lat=-32.96848&zoom=13

Hi,
Smae problem here, multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments with inner ways. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96227&lat=-37.82112&zoom=18

Hi,
Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments with inner ways. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96653&lat=-37.82070&zoom=18

Outer way cannot share segments with an inner way. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.40644&lat=-28.10141&zoom=18

All yours to fix.

I have changed the sports features of Bertram Oval and the adjacent basketball/netball courts. See what you think of it.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
Parking areas should only include the area used for parking, not the entrance/exit approns. I have modified one of your entries - see way/1017528949#map=19/-32.24735/115.84645.

The entry/exit can be mapped as a simple way tagged highway=service, service=driveway, surface=paved.

The changeset comment is not too good - see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi,
The landuse=retail way/1017532915 should only be for the area that is used for retail - not extended out to the road centre lines. See way/1017532915#map=19/-32.24735/115.84648

Hi,
The guide is one feature = one OSM entry. For the way: Goodstart Early Learning (1017530386) this should not only include the building but the play area out the back and the parking area at the front?
I'd leave the building tagged as the building, and transfer all the other tags to a new larger way... I have left this one alone for you to think about.

Hi,

I have corrected the relation/13618816 for Proclamation Track as it had errors

It would be nice to enter the other sports here. See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sport=discus_throw%3Bhammer_throw as a sample.

Hi,

OSM 'boundaries' are not for natural features but man's officialdom - such as National Parks, city, suburbs and villages boundaries. See osm.wiki/Relation:boundary

As you look to have made several of these 'boundary=natural' may I leave you to correct the tagging?

The relation/13477781 has a member (Way: 1006012131 "natural"="water") with the role 'inner' .. but it is outside the relations outer ways. I have removed it from the relation.. but it possibly belongs in another relation??

I've done the same on a few of these 'touching ring' things.
I understand it is difficult for computers to recognize things humans understand with little thought... pitty about that.