Done.

Place all the ways in the relation.
Delete the duplicate tags on the ways.
Break the ways where they overlay each other. Delete the overlaps.

----------------
I have also removed landuse=forest and replaced with natural=wood.

Hi,

The source "MBRC Planning Scheme ... I cannot find that on osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Queensland Would you elaborate on it?

relation/13599313 makes no sense?
An outer within an outer??? What does that mean?
And then what is the relation other than an address? If it is just an address then a node would suffice.

Hi,
Part reversion to restore pedestrian relation - restores deleted way/482481220.

Hi
The relation for Robina Waters 6467511 is very confused. A section of water to the north of Robina Island is not part of Robina Waters yet to both the east and west those sections of water are part of Robina Waters.

As an error Robina Island is mapped as an inner for Robina Waters .. yet it is no longer inside the outer way ... so should be excluded ... unless the northern water is actually part of Robina Water...???

Hi,
Just noticed this... nit picking but ...
The 'farmyard' way/173909018 is a land use - not the legal boundaries but the use to which the land is put. And talking about that - some of this area is for land use residential ... human swimming pools are not part of farm yards.
The other point it that the present mapping shows the area covered by trees. This can be corrected by making 'inners' in the tree relation.

The NAME of the shop is not 'Snow Gear and Equipment'.
See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hi
relation/13555927 is not closed (landuse=farmland)

See relation/13555927#map=16/-34.5526/146.0056 and https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.00382&lat=-34.55385&zoom=15

Hi,

These beach 'names' look to be 'descriptions'?

See
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
description=*

Also .. I would add the tag 'surface=sand' to these beaches. See natural=beach

Oh.. the over lay beach is

way/1007169299#map=17/-37.78032/148.96874

I have removed the offending way.

The entry of the beach 'Tamboon - Sydenham Inlet'/Tamboon Inlet' over lays a past entry of the beach 'bemm river'.

All these 'names' look to me to be 'descriptions' ...
See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

And description=*

Hi,

What is the source of the beach name 'Tamboon - Sydenham Inlet'?

Hi,

The 'name' of the beach looks to be a creek name. What is the source of the beach name?

A reminder of my past comment .. the beach could have a surface of rock or mud. See natural=beach ... I suggest using the tag surface=sand.

Hi,

There is an error in the method used to map these 2 buildings - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=142.47957&lat=-38.37850&zoom=18

For way/1012329935 they should be 3 separate ways as they are 3 separate buildings.

For way/1012329933 ... I make it 7, yes 7 separate buildings.

Consider using other imagery ... Mapbox looks clearer here compared to Bing.

One tip: square up the buildings using the key 'Q'.

.

This change set changed the named "South Island' tagged as an island later an islet that applied to both the tree area and the sand area

to

being only the sand area. This is not correct.

I have made a new relation for the sand area ... natural=beach, surface=sand .... And then restored the island/islet to be the whole tree area and sand area.

Similar has been done for the other Cocoss Islands... If you have done similar elsewhere would you please correct those?

.

.

.

.

.