OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
108858687 over 4 years ago

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.03864&lat=-37.78672&zoom=16

Click on the blue/green lines to see the error.

108851829 over 4 years ago

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

Administration boundaries (the PSMA sourced stuff) are not roads ... e.g.
Way 851954026 and way/851953079

Both have been tagged as roads .. these tags will be removed and the administration boundaries repaired.

Note: these administration boundaries are a problem for all of us, it is not just you.

108801441 over 4 years ago

man_made=silo

90654644 over 4 years ago

What is the source of your information for hole numbers?

90654644 over 4 years ago

There is NO grass here.

108619665 over 4 years ago

Hi,
There looks to be some errors on this Bowling Green Bay National Park ... the relation has 2 ways that almost cover the same area...
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.25781&lat=-19.35365&zoom=10
The norther section has the 2 ways .. I have not looked at the southern error.

108587564 over 4 years ago

Hi
The parking relation/13019200 is incorrect.
The roll 'inner' has be assigned to the outermost way which should have the role 'outer'. And all the ways with the role 'outer' are inside and mark features that should be excluded from the parking - so they should have the roll 'inner'!

107769809 over 4 years ago

Hi,

Are all your bus stops sourced from ptv.vic.gov.au ?

The ptv.vic.gov.au is not a source that can be used in OSM. See osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Victoria

108454355 over 4 years ago

What is the source of adding golf=cartpath to these roads???

One of the water ways is off the golf area yet it is now tagged as a golf hazard. Why?

108369863 over 4 years ago

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

I cannot see the sand bunker you have entered - Way: 966204342 - see way/966204342#map=19/-34.96340/138.52514

I have looked with Bing and Maxar Premium and .. err no. Looks to some rocks inside that area but no sand.

Can you explain?

108340748 over 4 years ago

Hi,

I take it the names for these new streams came from the NSW DCS Base Map? You will find the Base Map to be usefull where things are under tree cover.

107684309 over 4 years ago

Tag it disused if that is suitable. Maxar shows it very green while Bing shows it in use. My thinking is that the farmer may well use the track for harvesting, planting etc so it may become 'in use' once more. Some renders won't show disused - as in it vanishes, others render it differently.

108287043 over 4 years ago

Correction.
Norwest of Forbes. Not Parkes

107684309 over 4 years ago

I would think that the farmer uses these tracks to access the adjacent fields.
There is a mapped gate at the western end of Way: Banks Road (696650315). No mapped fence or gate at other locations.

A router should pay attention to the access tags, the access may not show on some maps. The problem of rendering should not impact the entry of data.

Rather than delete data - add to it. In this case add access=private. If you have evidence that the track is 'disused' then add the tags for that. Only remove things when they are well and truly gone.

107684309 over 4 years ago

HI,

The tag "access=private" can be used to say that a road is not open to the public - that is it is a private road.
The other problem is that the vic government has a name on at least one of these roads ..

Reverted and access tags added to tracks.

108181846 over 4 years ago

You have never been here? I have.

Pages Creek Rd is tertiary, certainly not service! The golf course does not run across this rd.

I have;
Reduce the size of the golf course, added access and description tags to it.
Tagged the road correctly.

86929981 over 4 years ago

Hi,

The building outlines look to be displaced by 5 metres relative to the mapped roads. The imagery used to produce the building footprints can be corrected to the road position and thus keep everything relative to one another correct.

107830709 over 4 years ago

Hi,

The name should be for the name only .. not a description such as 'Public Reserve'. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

The relation for 'Public Reserve' has 3 members.. one of them has no role - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.69958&lat=-42.89495&zoom=14

107763502 over 4 years ago

Take a look on the above link -shows the part where the things meet up.

What I would do is separate the ways at the nodes where they meet, delete both the new short ways where they meet. This would then be ok.

However for extra points, combine the ways that touch each outer into one continuous way.

Note: I have never used iD so I cannot help you there. But this is what I'd do. I use JOSM.

107463399 over 4 years ago

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.44583&lat=-28.07450&zoom=18

You should fix this, I find I learn best by fixing my own errors.