Errr ... imagery use Gmaps Sat? Is that Google related?

Hi,

Are the building, car park really not part of the resort???

By making them 'inners' in the relation they are excluded from the resort.

Hi,

Think you may have the construction mixed up with the existing road - see Way: The Northern Road (369219092)

Hi,

The 'inners' would be part of the club. As 'inners' in the relation they are excluded from being part of the club... So I don't think it is correct for the club.

----------------------------------
Next .. the 'outer' way is tagged as a building.. and an 'inner' is also tagged as a building .. you cannot have a building inside a building ..
See building:part for something like a building inside a building. building:part=*

If the outer way is the limit of the club only then it should not have a building tag .. probably landuse=recreation_ground.

highway=closed is not valid.

I have set the old section of the Pacific Hwy to
disused:highway=trunk

Hi
For the Ghan - under public transport V2 I don't think places where the train does not stop should be in the route relation.

What should be in the relation are places it does stop... those are missing.

The other thing is the direction .. the relation is only for one direction as tracks and stops can be on different sides, at least in some places.

Fixed:
Way: 476166959 removed from relation. Then looked at what it did .. absolutely nothing - so deleted.

Way: 907255818 - combined with other outer ways in forest relation to make one simple way.
Way: 476166964 (landuse=quarry) entered in relation forest as an inner.

See changeset/99499873#map=13/-38.2881/146.5879

Thanks.
Not familiar with the area at all.

Andrew - looks like the State Park could do with some land cover mapping.

Error ...

Building SAGE inside building Tonsley MAB...

Possibly use building:part ?

Hi,
relation/12318197 is not closed - meaning it does not form an area.

Why is this a multipolygon at all? Would a simple closed way not do the job? Same question for 80 collins st... a simple way would do.

Hi,

The multipolygon relation for 'landuse=forest' has at least 2 errors...

Way: 476166959 appears to have nothing to do with the relation.

The outerways of the relation self intersect and share segments .. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.58339&lat=-38.28349&zoom=15

Read all of the proposal for parking_space to aid your understanding.
osm.wiki/w/index.php?oldid=629318

HI,

3 errors in relationship roles - should be outers... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.10719&lat=-40.49454&zoom=12

6 months and still not fixed!

relation/11117034 has now been fixed..... as has another of your relations ...

Learn how to make multipolygons.

Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.79121&lat=-32.92262&zoom=18

Both relations will have the same problem. These multipolygon relation outerways cannot share segments...

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.79191&lat=-32.92436&zoom=18

Now correct!

Ways in order or route traveled.
Stops in order of route traveled.

Changes to route 686???

686 only travels in one direction - so it does not use both segments of the roundabout

686 stops at the top of Katoomba street... and at another stop you have deleted.

Best attempt made to fix this - using OSM only.
Numerous errors e.g. overlapping ways etc etc.

way/838967019 tagged as building=roof ... means that way is for the roof alone.
I think it would be better tagged as building=house as it was before your detailed additions to the tagging there (by the way - great detail added there).