OpenStreetMap
Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 100380749 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
I have partial reverted this in order to restore some administration boundaries.
Please try to improve your changeset comments - see changeset/100406510#map=16/-33.9332/151.1790 for some idea. Possibly try something simpler closer to home? Keep mapping. |
| 100249828 | almost 5 years ago | relation/12384632 is not correct. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.10104&lat=-35.34505&zoom=18 Personally this looks like a walkway and might be better as highway=footway, covered=yes??? |
| 99969981 | almost 5 years ago | OK, I have updated the India Pacific train route so it is now correct. |
| 79451981 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, 'operator=forests NSW' changed to 'Forestry Corporation of NSW'. Except for Helipad - Kookaburra - looks to be NPWS now? |
| 99969981 | almost 5 years ago | The Maxar imagery looks more upto date than bing. Is this now in operation? Or are the old lines still being used? Note: tags should be added for electrification - same as the connecting lines. |
| 93891029 | almost 5 years ago | See
I see some ~ 17 errors .... |
| 99634704 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, way/907615451 (wood) has no area - it just forms a line. I have deleted this way. The 'imagery used' should state the source for the information used in the changeset. OpenStreetMap (Standard) could not be the source for this change. Possibly Bing imagery ... or a personal survey or something else? |
| 100121085 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
The DCS base map suggests that the park has a larger area and the boundary is slightly different from the river. The park is not a boundary for the Hampton administration area, so I have removed it from there. |
| 47499974 | almost 5 years ago | Forbes 'office' is a plant nursery .. and I've retagged it as such. Source: annual report FC of NSW + visual imagery shows nursery outside .. |
| 99357657 | almost 5 years ago | Glens Creek is incorrect near the end - southern, the named creek goes further to the east rather than to the west. Buccarumbi Creek - the source end ... there is no name on the base map for the end .. so that should not carry the name. Both creeks are tagged 'intermittent' .. where did that information come from??? There is reasonable rainfall in this area .. I would expect them to have water most of the time. When you changed Old Glen Innes Road you should remove or alter the source tag as 'survey' no loner applies to 'asphalt' |
| 99357657 | almost 5 years ago | The "Forestry Corporation of NSW" is the correct name for the operator of State Forests in NSW.
|
| 99561855 | almost 5 years ago | The easiest thing for me to do is delete it. You can then re-enter the parking area. |
| 99561855 | almost 5 years ago | How should I 'close it'?????
|
| 99139560 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Muiltipolygons outer ways should not have the same tags on them as the relation. I have fixed relation/12305019 (grass fairway). |
| 99299846 | almost 5 years ago | Deleted. |
| 99561855 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
I'd think it should be a simple closed way? |
| 96130331 | almost 5 years ago | The comment remains. And is directed at the mapper who made the changes... comments made do get flagged to the mapper. The stated source is DCS Imagery. The changes made are not on the DCS imagery.
|
| 96130331 | almost 5 years ago | This does not appear on the DCS imagery... what is the source of this information?
Reasons why I ask? I'm looking at your Grafton Jail edits and cannot see the information in the source provided. |
| 99664314 | almost 5 years ago | Best to say what the imagery is then so as not to confuse nor strain your memory in a few years time.
What app you are using is easily seen - eg look at changeset/99664314. The relation problem I sent you a comment some 2 days ago on another relation - this is just a repeat of the same problem. Have fun. |
| 99592470 | almost 5 years ago | Arr .. good oh.
|