Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 85592293 | over 5 years ago | Partial reversion to restore relation. Ways 405828369, 405828362 restored together with their nodes. |
| 84867434 | over 5 years ago | You look to be an infrequent editor. So I have repaired this way in the interests of the map. Please take more care in future with the warnings given when attempting to add data to the map. |
| 85223123 | over 5 years ago | I note that these problems are still present and you continue to map. Please fix these problems. |
| 85524251 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.56163&lat=-33.55302&zoom=18 |
| 81930884 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
As you have failed to respond to my previous comment I am tempted to simply revert all your change sets with OpenTopoMap listed as a source. |
| 85001393 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 28643542 | over 5 years ago | Hi, These are tagged with source:name=* .. but there is no name=*. Possibly better as source:building=*??? |
| 53966601 | over 5 years ago | In the middle of the street?
|
| 85354888 | over 5 years ago | Hi, highway=path are not supposed to be wide enough to take a motor car. Usually assumed motorvehicle=no, just as a footpath is assumed to be motorvehicle=no. |
| 82126608 | over 5 years ago | Reverted. |
| 82146995 | over 5 years ago | Reverted. |
| 65883024 | over 5 years ago | Hi
|
| 82147976 | over 5 years ago | Reverted |
| 82147725 | over 5 years ago | Reverted |
| 85223123 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
relation/11101134 has a member whose role should be inner. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=117.08008&lat=-33.66698&zoom=12 |
| 84860653 | over 5 years ago | Sorry .. link
way/801445623 doubles back on itself.. |
| 84860653 | over 5 years ago | I would think you would be interested in fixing this error? |
| 84189109 | over 5 years ago | Thank you for confirming that you are getting notifications of changeset comments. Saves me from contacting the DWG. I note this also confirms you are ignoring my comments on errors. You will note that the relation is not rendering so deleting it will have no effect on the rendered map, it simply removes it from the error report.
|
| 84761762 | over 5 years ago | The link
highlights where duplicate segments occur in the relation/11073972. These duplicate segments are an error for a single building. To me that structure looks to be several individual buildings with 3 connecting walk ways. I would not use a relation at all, just tag the individual ways.
|
| 84189109 | over 5 years ago | I have no interest in continuing to fix your errors. Shall I simply delete than from now on? |