Err no.
Copyright breaches mean there are legal ramifications.

If someone were to steal the work of your project and start distributing it for there own purposes .. i think you'd be upset.

Copyright breaches should be dealt with as a priority.

If you want me to doi it .. and I do have other things to dp, then I will need to know;

when you started using whereis?

when you stopped using whereis?

what features you copied from whereis?

Are there any other sources you are useing other than tose avalibe as backgrounds in iD?

Some suggestions;

Read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Learn how to edit what is already in OSM rather than delete it and replace it with new entries.

This changeset has been reverted.

It destroyed administration boundaries..

Hi,
Highway=raceway named carpet jump on a node looks to be an error .. as there is no connection to any road.

The node named The Steps - now Queensland Gates - what is it?

The node named The Quarry has been deleted by another mapper..

Hi,
"Closure' is usually an access issue and should be tagged on the road with access=private or some other access=* tag.

I believe Whereis is copyright... so not legally able to copy that into OSM.

Hi,
Gymnasium 1 has been tagged sport=motor .. I have changed this to sport=gymnastics as I assume this was miss tagged.

The id editor says you used bing imagery .. it may juist have been the background shown.. maybe you could select OSM as your background.

In any case these boundaries are broken and should be fixed.

And .. what source did you use?

Hi,
I have changed way/437132115 from sport=motor to sport=model_car_racing, more specific.

Hi,

The way/705956693 looks to me like a go kart track.. not motor racing (car/bike).

Hi,
How can you say the source for these admin boundaries is bing imagery???

Some of these admin boundaries are broken...
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.47710&lat=-36.35141&zoom=11

Hi,
The relation multipolygons outer way has the same tag as the relation... this is not good.

As a way all the interior will be a 'reef' (in this case as it is tagged as a reef).

As a relation there is an interior that would not be a reef...

So which is it? Either remove the tags on the outer way to make a reef with a hole inside using the relation

Or

Delete the relation to leave a simple area as a reef.

Ok?

Relation needs fixing...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.69778&lat=-34.82373&zoom=18

Hi,Could you repair the Admin boundaries that this looks to have made faulty?
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.59844&lat=-38.14784&zoom=11

Hi,
Building way/743137692 self intersects .. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96696&lat=-37.79913&zoom=17

Hi,
Bing does not show the river bank here .. Maxar tends to be more up to date in 'my' area.
So what imagery did you use?

river bank is a more accurate tag - it is a river and it is the river bank, not 'just' water.

OK,

So the building is elevated .. tag it layer=1, this way it goes 'over' other things on the 'ground' (which is the default of layer=0).

I have made a few changes... layer=1 to a few things, added entrance=yes. You will need to add

'exit' to the platforms.
lifts (highway=elevator in OSM)
the stair that goes nowhere should have a corridor from it.
The phone .. is that at layer=1?

And probably many other details ..

Oh .. the Maxar Preimum Imagery looks to be up to date?

Hope that helps.

Opps got the relationship number wrong it is 10253313

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Some problems with relation/741640374.

As a guide .. one OSM element is best when it is one real thing, not a bridge + a building + a station.

A multiploygon relation outer ways should not touch nor share segments.

A bridge usually goes over the top of things, in OSM the layer=* tag is used to indicate what is over or under the 'normal' layer.

---------------
Use the OSM wiki to get details ..
e.g. railway=station
So the easiest thing to do is use a node rather than try to define an area. However this has already been done so your entry is a duplicate of it.

The 'building' is probably the south western section of the relation - so tag that way as the building - 2 story? The 'bridge' the north easter section, bridge=yes, layer=1?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
An error made here with multipolygon relations. The outers should form a closed area.. neither the residential are nor park do that.
The park should remain as a simple way, no need for a relation here.
The residential area would be bound by the edge of the lane to the park and the park by the same lane .. the land would be landuse=highway .. but it is not a significant thing.

------------------------
I have made the park back into a simple way.
I have closed the residential relation .. but I think that too can be simplified back into a simple single way.