These rivers and there banks are part of the park... relationship 10227804 should not have them as inners...

That works for me.
Don't worry about making errors .. we all do them. Keep mapping.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

This changset has several errors. You may find the OSM wiki helpfull in resolving these..
osm.wiki/Main_Page Use the search box to find things.

One of these errors is relation/10224797 build=roof;yes. OSM does not do buildings as several values, buildings can only be one value. The relation looks to have 2 buildings - I assuem one is th eroof the other is jst a building.. What I would do is delete the relation and tag each separate way as building=*. Thew roof should get a layer=1 too..

Giday,
The Men's Sheds have been discussed on the Australian group and concluded with osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Mens_Shed

Giday,
The Australian group have discussed these Men's Sheds, the result is osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Mens_Shed

Hi,
Add an object with only a name will not make it render. E.g. name=Men's Shed .. but what is it? Officed? Club? Community faclity ??? It has to have more than a name ...
For Men's Shed see osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Mens_Shed

Hi,
Altered the Men's Shed to match osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Mens_Shed

Hi,
Altered this to match osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Mens_Shed

There are many long rivers.
And there are limitations on how many members a multipolygon relation should have - 300. Personally I limit mine to 200 - this allows more additions later usually without hitting the limit. If you get close - simply use 2 or more relations.
Good luck.

Multipolygon relations inner rings cannot touch or share segments with outer rings.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.43437&lat=-37.78749&zoom=18

Introducing Way: 738187409 has made the relation for the river bank not closed. It should be deleted.... what was it purpose?

It was not very obvious in rendering. SO I took a look at the cover, the scrub does not go all the way to the eastern side so I made a gap.. there will now be a blank bit between it and the sea ... it should show up now. Looks good to me.

Hi,

The relation/10168936 is a duplicate of relation/10168935.
Both of these relations you made for the park that has 2 ways previously tagged as parks..

Well multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments or nodes - they should not touch one another.

2 solutions; both delete the relations!

Revert back to having no relation and simply tag each way as separate parks as it was before
OR
Combine the 2 ways into one way and tag the single way as a park.

There is no need for a relation here.
.

The Lower Goulburn National Park ... includes the river ... please correct the relation/9273393.

This relation is no longer closed.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.24120&lat=-36.19125&zoom=15

This realtion 10163446 crosses itself. See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.26210&lat=-36.20372&zoom=15

This or one of your 2 previous edits looks to have broken relation/9198482.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.62591&lat=-36.09610&zoom=14

Bonds Rd ways 203043705, 203043704 and 203043702 look to be actually Josephine St.

What are you doing in this edit?

What is the source of this edit?

No changeset comments ..I don't know what you were trying to do ..

But you removed all but 1 way from the relation for the Tasman Sea!

Use changeset comments!!!!!!
See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I am correcting the Tasman Sea entry.

You need to explain the rest of this changeset and start using changeset comments!

Humm.. Should be rendering by now?

Oh, I failed to delete the natural=2 values. Done.

And I have added the tag natural=coastline to the islands outerways.

See how that goes.