Hi,
The Geographical Names Board of NSW do not name trig points. Trig points and survey markers are Spatial Services - NSW Survey Control Information Management System.

Trig points are placed where they can be seen and used, that usually means some prominence. Because there is a higher place near by does not mean that the lower place has no name and the higher one does have a name. There is only ~100 meters height difference between the two.

The names North Ramshead and South Ramshead may set the extent of the range of the Ramshead. Possibly contacting the Geographical Names Board may lead to a story behind these names. What research have you done? The Geographical Names Board presently state South Ramshead is at the lower height location.

There are trig points shown on the topo map that have no name .. and are certainly high. So I discount the trig station theory.

Hi,
South Rams Head was in the correct position. The peak you have moved it to is unnamed.

Refer to NSW topo map.

I have removed the name and left this peak where you placed it. The real South Rams Head has another entry now.

No response.

Deleted name, office and level.

Hay, no need to be sorry. It is easy to do, just keep an eye out for them -they are not 'nice'.

Hi
Way: 664664565 is a dead end. Don't see that on satellite views. Are you certain that Way: 664482493 is not a more correct representation? Next - you say cutting .. yet both look to be on the same level as teh road beside them -Victoria Parade. Next the have no connection with the cross street Clarendon Street ...

Way: 664651646 has no tag .. what is it?

Hi
This has broken the admin boundary relations for;
District of Molonglo Valley (3337649)
Denman Prospect (5335597)
District of Stromlo (3337651)
Wright (5335595)

I'll leave it to you to repair.

Hi,

This has broken the admin boundary relations 6827851 and 3337651. I'll leave it to you to repair.

Hi,

This tree area cross itself
Way: 664924525

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.05144&lat=-37.95899&zoom=11

Certainly. However to addition should not destroy what is already there.. unless that has been changed 'on the ground'.

In JOSM you can make a blank layer - top left click on 'File' then click on 'New Layer'. Make your parking lots etc in there and you will not be using any old nodes, ways or relations. So it will be impossible to destroy any old stuff there. And the new stuff will be completely separate from the old stuff.
Then you have the problem of joining any new roads with old roads. Probably easiest to then download the present old stuff in OSM - top left click on 'File' then click on 'download in current view' and then join old and new.
That help?

Hi,
Looking now, using bing imagery and see that gray colour evidence of paving there. Similar colour to the main road. But you are right it can be that gray gravel too. The problem is that there are some 'gravel' roads that are sand coloured.

Hi,
This looks to have broken the boundary for the suburb of Mitchel...

Can you fix it?

And you might check other suburban boundaries while your there.

That looks about right.
Cheers.

Hi,
This change has damaged Way: 75828281 "leisure"="common". OSM Inspector reports "duplicate_segment". Looks like a node has been dragged away from where it was. You might like to separate the 'common' from the road to help both road and 'common'.

Hi,

Hi,
You need to watch the administration boundary relations when you do this. Unfortunately they are tied to the roads so when you ad detail to the roads you can break the administration boundaries.
I have repaired 2 Admin boundaries here.

Hi,
The entire area is not a camp site.. possibly landuse=recreation_area?

Hi,
Node: 5058252694
sport=paddleboard ?
osm.wiki/FR:Tag:sport%3Dtable_tennis ?

Hi

These roads are not connected - and they should be.
way/662371243 and way/172946484

Might be worth while keeping an eye on
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.74092&lat=-32.53596&zoom=16&opacity=0.82

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Some hints.
Relation outer ways should not touch - the building touch in this instance. I would make each building a simple way - no relation. Each building is probably an individual height so they will need to be separate anyway.

The school. As a node is the basic first step. Then it can become an area - that would surround the buildings and include parking, playgrounds, sports areas. Arrr but the school is already an area - includes the Primary School see way/514096660#map=17/-43.02413/147.04771. That could be edited to exclude the primary school and then make a new way for it.

That is what I think. I'll leave it to you to contemplate.

Vicinity Centres...
Tagged as a building

But also tagged as an office?

So what are is it?
A building - leave the office tag off
An office .. leave off the building tags.

OSM guide is one feature - one OSM entry.
Suggest you leave the building entry .. remove the office tag
Make a new node for the office and add its details there.
If the building is for offices ... then building=office - see the OSMwiki building=*#Commercial

Still many problems here.

Sean .. look at https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.74092&lat=-32.53596&zoom=16&opacity=0.82

Try to fix these problems.
way/655517428 has no tag to say what it is.

For me and the others the simplest thing to do is delete the lot - leaving the shops. This won't change the map as the things that would be deleted are not rendering anyway.