OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
66383446 almost 7 years ago

Duplicate segment in relation/9226967

65904906 almost 7 years ago

Duplicate segment in relation/9170174

65954495 almost 7 years ago

Duplicate segment in relation/9175901

65393733 almost 7 years ago

The mapping of the national park has exclusions inside that looked to be exclusions of non tree areas. I had not got back to that. Thanks for the reminder. I have now just rough checked it and it looks good, so I am now happy with that park boundary entry.

So .. do you want to add a rough tree area (not on the park boundary) .. or will you wait for me to do it?

Just done the Syd. Royal NP as a separate tree area. But I think some of that tree area will go to scrub.

66157249 almost 7 years ago

It is not easy.
The problem with a team all working with similar goals in the one area can lead to this duplication.

How to over come it? I'd try separating the area and/or the goals of each mapper. But I don't know the team and its goals so cannot say definatly one way of the other. Good Luck.

66648366 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
There are a few repairs to do ...

ps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.21387&lat=-31.88315&zoom=6

66632392 almost 7 years ago

Hi,

The entry of Merlin Street .. does not join to itself - there are 2 nodes that should be one node so that the street joins .. not overlay these nodes.
Node: 1864778964
Node: 6236207892

These kind of problems can be found by looking at
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.21387&lat=-31.88315&zoom=6

66157249 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
Your entry for Clugstons Road is a duplicate of one made ~ 10 minutes earlier by miroslavuzice87

... I'll leave you to delete it and work out how to aviod similar difficulties?

7680901 almost 7 years ago

It take a while :(
It is a little better, but needs more. Too hot to do Coats Track now.

65904906 almost 7 years ago

Tower Hotel is the name. Fine Wines is an advertising description.

Relation outer ways should not touch.

Fixes -
Buildings as separate ways- one as a roof the other as retail.
shop as a simple node.

16859609 almost 7 years ago

There are a number of them on dead end side roads .. no thoroughfare. An occasional resident.

I'll change this one. toll both. When I get to it. There are quite a few in National Parks with similar policies.

66180014 almost 7 years ago

Sorry but this does generate error messages. So I have crudely fixed it.
The buildings are now correct.

The outer way for Huonville High School has the address data from your, now deleted, relation. This outer way could be divided into the High School and Primary School to distinguish between the two if you want. Or you could just rename it to incorporate both.

66734913 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
A relation is not needed for this scrub. I have made it into 2 separate simple ways.

7680901 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
I have;

Deleted tag natural=wood from the National Park relation.

Added new relation for the tree area - so it does not follow the NP boundary, has holes for non tree areas. It is fairly coarse, but better than using the NP boundary.

16603511 almost 7 years ago

The national park is not all trees. I have;

Deleted tag natural=wood from the National Park relation.

Added new relation for the tree area - so it does not follow the NP boundary, has holes for non tree areas. It is fairly coarse, but better than using the NP boundary.

40410785 almost 7 years ago

Hi,

It is much much better to have a separate relation for the tree area!

So I have;

Deleted tag natural=wood from the National Park relation.

Added new relation for the tree area - so it does not follow the NP boundary, has holes for non tree areas. It is fairly coarse, but better than using the NP boundary.

16859609 almost 7 years ago

Hi,

I believe the following does not follow present practice?
Node: 174841227
Tags:
"barrier"="border_control"
"motorcar"="yes"
"bicycle"="no"
"foot"="no"

I think it is a toll both, motor vehicles are charged - unless they have a permit. Bicycles and pedestrians are not charged, but allowed through.

64562306 almost 7 years ago

Hi,

This cycle way does not appear in Bing - at least in some sections. I think some sections are using roads/track that are in use by motor vehicles.

I have broken it and joined it to 'Old Gembrook Road using Bing. Check to see if it OK with what you know.

65499586 almost 7 years ago

Hi,

Relations ...
I have fixed relation/9108726 .. by removing the fairway. As a simple way with no area it plays no part in the grass area.

You should fix the others in this area.

Please see and use https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.46617&lat=-34.44165&zoom=14

You can pan and zoom in/out to find your errors .. that is what I use it for.

49763650 almost 7 years ago

More reading/comments here
https://www.ski.com.au/xf/threads/location-of-the-real-south-ramshead.67076/