Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 61108020 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
Ar .. you have only just begun. Pardon while I watch with interest what you do.
|
| 61134731 | over 7 years ago | There is no permanent SLSC building on the beach!!!! The Russel Jones Memorial Pools' name does not include the date. Nor do there need to be both a node and a way with the details. |
| 61134731 | over 7 years ago | Bad changeset comment.
|
| 61134207 | over 7 years ago | Can be better.
Circles can be made - then separated into circular segments. No need to address details on things that don't receive mail and visitors go to the park as it has a name they can search for.. not the playground. Fix your other errors. |
| 61134076 | over 7 years ago | Moving Le desert from France to Australia is not on. |
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | Before you changed is way/388771229/ it rendered correctly with landcover=scrub and natural=scrub!!! And I believe that the change you made there is yet to be processed .. The problem here is apparently man_made=clearcut. You will note this is not rendering correctly at the moment as the changes you have made are still to be processed. We will wait and see if this renders correctly without the man_made tag. And then reintroduce the landcover tag and see if that truly makes a difference? I note that the at least some of the other ways with landcover and natural=scrub continue to be correctly rendered. I have not looked at all of them. OSM looks to be a bit busy at the moment... so lets leave it for 2 days and see what happens. |
| 61082732 | over 7 years ago | This rendered correctly before you remove the landcover tag. |
| 61049149 | over 7 years ago | Interiors are dealt with by declaring a multipolygon relation - the outer way is placed into the relation with the role 'outer'. Then the way for the inner is placed into the relation with the role 'inner'. You can have more than one inner, and more than one outer. The relation carries the tags, not the outer way nor the inner. An inner could have different tags - e.g. a playground. Best to find you an example?
|
| 61049149 | over 7 years ago | Oh the pitches you have marked as basket ball .. one is netball - different court markings. I have corrected this. There are a few other pitches to map here too. |
| 61049149 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
First as a single building .. it crosses itself. That is not on. Second there is a conflict between the building and a road already in OSM Third .. using bing .. it is not a single building .. but at least 5 separate buildings. Possibly 7. Note - some buildings connect by covered walkways and these can confuse the issue. Similar comments on multiple buildings for some of the other additions. In short .. needs work. You may find DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery better. |
| 61047619 | over 7 years ago | If you look at way/388771229/
I have commented at length on changeset/60102631. Further comments can be made there. |
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | Note
man_made=clearcut looks like it does not render see way/412607126 |
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | Tagging for the render? :) Editors should allow 'any tag you like' as that is an OSM principle. Natural=scrub is the documented tag on the OSMwiki .. if you search for scrub there you get that page. Natural=scrub has over 1,800,000 uses in the data base, so it should render!
I had not realized any render was using landuse=scrub. Possibly the rendering was of man_made=clearcut? And that might be the best tag for it. In principle .. one feature .. one OSM item? So maybe this way would be best tagged with only man_made=clearcut untill it regenerates somewhat? Humm maybe it is man_made=clearcut that is not rendering? That has only 4,000 uses on the data base. Why don't you try each tag in turn (and onlly one tag)? See what happens? Note that it can take some time for a render to note the change in tags. |
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 61012535 | over 7 years ago | No.
They are farmers fields.
They may have water ways that the farmer has made .. but they are not creeks, streams nor rivers. And stop using the name tag as a descriptor!!!! |
| 60943906 | over 7 years ago | Again .. names are for names only. Not as descriptions. E.g. 'Intermittent Stream', 'Condamine Intermittent River', 'Condamine Riverbank', 'Service Road' etc. Remove them.
The cemetery IS NOT A VILLAGE!!!!! Way: Killarney Cemetery (609862966) The riverbanks are not a river banks .. the river does not flow through it. Looks like a farmers field .. possibly for growing rice? Or is it a water storage device? See OSM basin. Way: 609862967 Way: 609862969 Way: Condamine Riverbank (609862972) |
| 60947951 | over 7 years ago | The Prince of Wales Hospital should be expanded to the buildings and linked to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_of_Wales_Hospital_(Sydney). The landuse should be removed .. that is on a much larger area.
|
| 60930936 | over 7 years ago | Sorry, yes I corrected it. But wanted to pass the information on to avoid repeats. Keep mapping, there is heaps to do. |
| 60941006 | over 7 years ago | name=Old Smoke ... but what is it?
|
| 60941006 | over 7 years ago | Inappropriate change set comment. Again. Your Swamp DropDown is not a swamp. It could be a storm water drain ... Swamps are drawn as an area. the Coogee SLSC is already on a building there is no need for it to be on a node. And this node now distorts the building. Multiple nodes and ways for Russel Jones Memorial pool Why? |