Warin61's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
84303765	over 5 years ago	A path would normally connect to the road.
84191158	over 5 years ago	On Relation: 11039156 there is the tag reef=mud. But there is no tag natural=reef but rather natural=wetland. Which is it a wetland or a reef? There are similar conflicts on some of your other entries.
84079012	over 5 years ago	I think he reads them, so future changes may not have similar difficulties.
84079012	over 5 years ago	He never responds.
84130477	over 5 years ago	1) I do not understand the changeset comment "Amendments Requested by Osm". Link to this request? 2) "Sand at Low Tide" appears to be a DESCRIPTION! I have removed this one and others. Please do not add any more other than real names in the name tag. Descriptions should go in the description tag. The map should show what you are trying to describe. Features such as buildings are not named 'building', nor tree areas as 'tree' .. the render can show these without overloading the resultant map with text describing things. 3) You should respond to these comments! You can do so here. This confirms you have revived the message and you may then enter any discussion you want.
83386726	over 5 years ago	This has harmed the French Island National Park boundary. This and your later changesets have made a bit of a mess of it. I'll have to come back to it. Please don't change things that are already in OSM unless that is what you intend.
83386726	over 5 years ago	Hi, Same comments on using the name tag for a description .. don't do it.
83578754	over 5 years ago	Hi, Problem with way/790661598, a section of it has 0 width. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.30123&lat=-38.45372&zoom=16 The name tag should only be used for names, not descriptions. Please review 'Mud at Low Tide' and 'Sand at Low Tide' and possibly change the tag 'name' to 'description'.
83979103	over 5 years ago	Hi, Welcome to OSM. An issue with Way: 795123700 Tags: "addr:suburb"="Ivanhoe East" "addr:housenumber"="154" "building"="house" There are 2 building here and you have connected them in one way such that they cross over with no 'space'. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.05066&lat=-37.77388&zoom=18 It think the smaller of the two is a garage as a driveway leads to it, so it is not a house.
83639574	over 5 years ago	No 47 has the same problem. Looks like ther are a few of them... Use https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.95697&lat=-26.63113&zoom=18 and pan around to spot them. I'll leave them for you to fix, I'd just make them a simple way around the outside and not bother with the extra structure.
83806163	over 5 years ago	I would think they are all park of the park, maintained by the same operator etc. I see no reason to exclude them, but than I am not familiar with the area.
74557980	over 5 years ago	Just looks a little strange. I added the cop shop and RFB.
83639574	over 5 years ago	Hi, Welcome to OSM. Muiltipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments. The relation for No 39 I have edited to remove that problem. PS you may find Ersi imagery to be more upto date than bing, and Maxar possibly even better.
83806163	over 5 years ago	Hi, Would not the parking areas, softball etc be part of the parklands? I realize that was not done by you , but you are more local than me.
74557980	over 5 years ago	Hi, I don;t understand the name on a house of 'Possums Home". Can you explain?
83586894	over 5 years ago	Another relation - deleted.
83711923	over 5 years ago	Hi, Multipolygon relation outer members cannot share segments. So the 'Bolck A is generating errors. What I would do is simply have one outer way on the outside and one inner way.
83643134	over 5 years ago	Hi, Thanks for mapping the parks. Where you mapped relation/11003490, as a park inner for way/792498124 (a playground)... Umm no. The play ground is part of the park and not excluded from it. So there is no need for a relation. I have corrected this.
83220992	over 5 years ago	Hi, Welcome to OSM... A problem with your edit. The bicycles appear to be able to ride around the 'cycleway' but they cannot ride to it on the footway as there is no bicycle=yes on it. The name tag should be for the name only, these appear to be descriptions where the tag description=* would be more appropriate? Please keep mapping.
83597579	over 5 years ago	Hi, The breaking of Aberdeen Street by adding way (792182556, v1) has broken various relations... Relation: Geelong Station - North Geelong Station via Newtown and Minerva Road (5288897) Relation: Manifold Heights (2456212) Relation: Newtown (2456248) Relation: Hamilton Highway (8014750) Relation: Geelong City - Inverleigh via Fyansford (2672978) Would you like to repair these?