OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
72664814 over 6 years ago

Problem with relation/9841582 - dupicated segment. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.40686&lat=-33.27766&zoom=18

70726074 over 6 years ago

Hi,
Way: Perth Busport (552513578) needs some work... looks like it has 3 'building parts'... but they have tags for a building as well.. very confusing.

71805368 over 6 years ago

Hi,

About Carss Park.
According to the LPI Base Map the park does not stop where the trees are but extends further. And I would include the car parks as part of the park too. In short, look at the LPI Base Map for the park boundaries and try and resolve that to any signs on the ground.

Note: I have tagged the swimming pool as 'disused' due to its closure caused by the water leaks.

71293249 over 6 years ago

Hi,
There are still problems with these relations around Melbourne
9693070 is one of them, looks like 5 in total.
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.60761&lat=-39.75450&zoom=6&opacity=0.71

72475657 over 6 years ago

Duh. That should be Way: 706115379

72474208 over 6 years ago

way/706102957 should have role inner in the relation

72475657 over 6 years ago

way/9819399 should be role inner i the relation.

72474208 over 6 years ago

Problem ..

relation/9819240 see
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.12697&lat=-28.80709&zoom=18

72475657 over 6 years ago

Problem in relation/9819240 ... same as the other problems..

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.20061&lat=-28.76297&zoom=17

You should start trying to fix these.

72424868 over 6 years ago

relation/9814681 shares segments.. see
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.91940&lat=-36.09079&zoom=16

72371259 over 6 years ago

Hi
relation/9808435 has 5 members - 3 of which should have the role 'inner' ..

There is also a duplicated segment.. from the two outers sharing the same location .. easiest to simply delete the shared part.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.18147&lat=-28.81660&zoom=14&opacity=0.75

72406825 over 6 years ago

Hi,
The relation you made 9813353, v1 .. is not closed .. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.40607&lat=-36.40858&zoom=16&opacity=0.75

iD should have told you that before you saved it?

72331773 over 6 years ago

Hi,

The relation/9803819 has 2 members - both have the role 'outer' .. yet one is inside the other. It appears that one is an island inside the waterway. This should be repaired, probably by making the roles of the island an 'inner'.

72257685 over 6 years ago

No need to apologize. I mucked up 3 relations the other day... why I monitor the things!

72257685 over 6 years ago

Deleting way/152424431 has madethe bangaroo relation/2025307 open (not closed).

71270676 over 6 years ago

Try http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/

71270676 over 6 years ago

Hi,
node/6548730971 only has a name, nothing to say what it is.

72161620 over 6 years ago

Hi,

There is a problem with the relation/9108491 - North Metropolitan TAFE. Multipolygon relations cannot have there outer ways share segments.

As the TAFE would be responsible not only for the building but the grounds around them I would draw ways around the site - separate from the buildings and have those as members of this relation, not the buildings.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.86200&lat=-31.94808&zoom=17&opacity=0.67

72105802 over 6 years ago

way/692514426 is for trees.. deleting this has removed the trees from this area. Instead of deleting it .. modify its position?

Modifying way/692514418 has modified both the tree area AND the boundary of this national park that this way defines. This way should NOT be modified unless the National Park Boundary is wrong? If you want to change the trees here than divorce the relation for trees from the national park boundary - this is a big job. I'd leave it for a separate task.

Reverted this change set to restore park boundary and trees. .

72039421 over 6 years ago

I'll have a look at it later.