OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
69414149 over 6 years ago

Hi,
The software does not automatically combine relations with the same name.

We mappers have to place the individual ways in to the relations .. in this case using roles of 'outer'
An example might help?
relation/5709558#map=15/-33.8908/151.2727
On the left panel you can see the members of the relation - the first one is a label - where to put the name of the relation - Bondi in this case .. then the outers are listed.

In the list of outers there is 'Ramsgate Avenue' with the role outer. The same way is also part of the relation for 'North Bondi' .. see
way/383661777

---------------------
PS I don't like policies, rules and labels that are nonsense .. like land USE = grass... complete idiocy.

69393046 over 6 years ago

Hi,
multipolygon relations outer ways cannot touch - against the 'rules'..

69414149 over 6 years ago

Hi,
Why do you have 3 relations .. for the same thing (Miami)??? And each of those relations do not form a closed area...

69399871 over 6 years ago

Hi,
The park relation is not good. The 2 outer ways cross each other and that is against the 'rules'. In this case I'd make a simple outer way - no relation.

18761661 over 6 years ago

It was a though to reduce the use of place=locality.. but looking at pierces corner .. there are lots of crossings of the ways there and most of them have traffic light tags on them as they should. So if I were to try and place a highway=junction where would I place it??? As highway=junction does not look to be documented I gave up ..

Some success with natural=bay. But I am leaving place=locality on natural=point as it is not documented, and leaving it on others that are not rendered too ... Strawberryhills I have changed from locality to neighborhood - think that fits.

18761661 over 6 years ago

HI,

Would this be the road junction of vic rd and Pennant Hills rds ..? might be better as the tag for highway=junction name= etc now..

267063 over 6 years ago

Hi,

What is the source of these localities?

Node: Rathane (283346895)
Node: Telford (283345301)

I don't see them on the LPI Base Map.

45286398 over 6 years ago

Not fussed at all. But not a hotel.

45470869 over 6 years ago

Hi,
Changing from construction to constructed not only means changing highway=construction but also the removal of the tag construction=* ...

69078685 over 6 years ago

Looking good!

59467411 almost 7 years ago

Test???
There are sandboxes for testing, and fantasy sites for fantasy. Use them, not OSM.

40346136 almost 7 years ago

Deleted way/319225015. no tags. And others with no tags. If it has no tags then there is no information on what it is .. clutter.

27887556 almost 7 years ago

Deleted some of these. They are not under construction, some have no tags to say what they are ... clutter for 4 years.

69078685 almost 7 years ago

Good Luck. Should not be too hard, if you need help .. ask.

69136514 almost 7 years ago

Hi,

Where a path ends .. it should normally join to something. For Way: 683270667 I have extended it to Cadigal Place, then detailed the 4 steps on the path.
If a path or road just stops without any exit then add the tag 'noexit=yes'.

I have also expanded the nearby park to the LPI Base Map boundaries.

62851839 almost 7 years ago

Hi
way/507890202 is not visible in the LPI Imagery .. yet you changed it from construction .. I'll change is back.

64635398 almost 7 years ago

Similar comment for way/407170306.

69102837 almost 7 years ago

Hi

For way/678304435 North West Transitway you have changed the tag highway=construction to highway=service, but left construction=service. If the construction has finished the tag construction=service needs to be removed as well as changing highway=construction to highway=service.

69078685 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
welcome to OSM.

The relations that have been created here are not correct.
For the grass it is simpler to create a close way to represent the area. The relation had a line that enclosed no area. I have fixed this.

For the recreation ground .. the relation was not closed - had a gap. It needs the addition of 2 ways to close the gap. I'll leave you to do that?

68687088 almost 7 years ago

I'll restore the old entry for this state forest.

One place i worked in had a summery of the copyright laws above the photocopying machines.. there is a limit of 10% of the work that can be copied for study/research/review .. over that 10% and you breach the law.. think that is case law as determined by a court .. not in the act/regs.