Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 29302029 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
I think this should be tagged with access=private (scouts only) tent=yes, toilets=yes, showers=no ... and no leisure=park. But I am not certain of the location... |
| 62571287 | almost 7 years ago | Hi, I have trouble speeling. While named in the past OSM as Gungarten, if you look a little north you'll find Gungartan Pass, spelling it that way gets you the NSW names board entry. PS a ridge is not a peak. Kerries ridge is a way... not a single node I have corrected these. |
| 62342529 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 66126469 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 63925264 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 66738472 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 66923266 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 66896147 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 66932385 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 66805589 | almost 7 years ago | HI, way/667489987 overlaps but does not connect to 426262783 |
| 67070164 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
Relation outer ways should not touch one another. In this case I have added a simple way enclosing all of what I think is used by the hospital and tagged it amenity=hospital with the name. And deleted the relation, the buildings are already tagged as buildings and the hospital is better described as amenity=hospital. Please check the hospital outline - might be smaller than what is there. |
| 65538774 | almost 7 years ago | Add tag building=retail so shop=mall will render. You do need to add tags to those things that have no tags... ---------------
|
| 65904906 | almost 7 years ago | A multiploygon relation can not share outer ways.. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.65113&lat=-34.92011&zoom=12 Show 4 otehr relations with the same problem. And this one will pop up again too... Fix them. ---------------------------------------------- |
| 40562950 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 65835569 | almost 7 years ago | Still having problems with relations. relation/9159717 ... one outer way .. but inners within inners ??? Does not make sense. I have changed it ... it can be further enhanced. |
| 60111716 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 67008222 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
This changeset broke the Strathnairn administration Boundary relation. I have restored it by reverting some of this changeset. I think it is ok but best to check.
|
| 19497499 | almost 7 years ago | As the imagery does not show a cycle way .. and the 'cycleway' was entered some 5 years ago.. I don't think there is a cycle way there. What may have occurred it that someone made a 'cycleway' to indicate a route .. that is actual on that road.. but they did not know how to enter it in OSM. There were several of these around Ballarat, I did manage to find the mapper for some of them and have him work on them .. they are now not generating errors so I have not been back to look (in that 'to do list'). This may well be another of them.
At the moment I am tempted to eliminate the cycle way and place the cycle route on the road. Someone may yell - if there actually is a cycle way I hope they do! |
| 66899371 | almost 7 years ago | HI,
|
| 66823203 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|