Hi,
On Ways 328539700, 328539699, and in another change set 2 more ways as well you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See natural=scrub

Hi,
On Way: 270175864 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See natural=scrub

Note you have done this on several changesets/ways.

Hi,
On Way: 237817031 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See natural=scrub

Hi,
Way is tagged landuse=scrub, I think it should be tagged natural=scrub. The wiki entry for 'scrub' is under the key 'natural'.

Hi,
Way: 499700185 is tagged landuse=scrub, I thing it should be tagged natural=scrub. The wiki entry for 'scrub' is under the key 'natural'.

Hi,
The Berkhamsted Christmas Tree Place is tagged landuse=scrub. Scrub is normally tagged natural=scrub, not the key 'natural' applies to thing that man has altered.

Hi,
The way/73600842 is now tagged landuse=scrub. I think you meant to tag it natural=scrub? Scrub is not a land use...

Yep, that would be better, go ahead and do it.

Ich verwechsle das Radar und das Teleskop, weil sie sich im selben OSM-Feature befinden (Weg: TIRA / Geb. 2 (335457217).
Es gibt hier kein Tag für ein Radioteleskop. Das einzige Etikett für ein Teleskop besagt, dass es sich um ein Radarteleskop handelt - ich glaube nicht, dass so etwas existiert. Radar ja. Teleskop ja. Aber Radarteleskop Nr.

Wo ist das Radioteleskop? Sollte es keinen eigenen OSM-Knoten / Weg geben?

Beachten Sie, dass ich vorsätzlich beleidigen möchte. Ich versuche nur, das telescope:type=radar
---------------
I confuse the radar and the telescope because they are on the same OSM feature (Way: TIRA / Geb. 2 (335457217).
There is no tag for a radio telescope here. the only tag for a telescope says it is a radar telescope - I don't think such a thing exists. Radar yes. Telescope yes. But radar telescope no.

Where is the radio telescope? Should it not have a separate OSM node/way?

Note I intend on offense. Just trying to understand telescope:type=radar

Hola,
Relación: Campo de fútbol Nuevo Cáceres (3890446) no es tiempo leisure=pitch sino landuse=recreation_ground. Cada "pitch' ya está etiquetada.

------------
Hi,
Relation: Campo de fútbol Nuevo Cáceres (3890446) is not leisure=pitch but landuse=recreation_ground. Each pitch is already tagged.

Hallo,
Weg: TIRA / Geb. 2 (335457217) markiert mit "Teleskop: Durchmesser" = "34" "Zugriff" = "Privat" "Man_made" = "Teleskop" "Teleskop: Typ" = "Radar" "Name" = "TIRA / Geb. 2" " loc_name "=" "Die Kugel" "" building "=" yes "" operator "=" Fraunhofer FHR "" height "=" 54 "

Ich glaube nicht, dass Teleskope Radar sind. Ich denke, es wäre besser, als Turm zu markieren: Typ = Radar
Turm: Bau = Kuppelbau = Radom.

Was denkst du?
--------------------------
Hi,
Way: TIRA / Geb. 2 (335457217) tagged as "telescope:diameter"="34" "access"="private" "man_made"="telescope" "telescope:type"="radar" "name"="TIRA / Geb. 2" "loc_name"=""Die Kugel"" "building"="yes" "operator"="Fraunhofer FHR" "height"="54"

I don't think telescopes are radar. I think it would be better tagges as tower:type=radar
tower:construction=dome building=radome.

What do you think?

Hi,
You tagged Node: 936401654 as "telescope:type"="radar". Did you mean radio? I don't think radar is a telescope.
I have changed it to radio, if that is wrong .. change it back.

Cześć,
Przetłumacz automatycznie na język polski.

Węzeł: Ⰹ (5627184805) z "name" = "Ⰹ" "tourism" = "viewpoint" "man_made" = "teleskop" "Teleskop: typ" = "Ⰹ" nie ma sensu.
Czy ten teleskop służy do obserwacji astronomicznych? jeśli tak, to jest optyczny lub radioteleskop?

Hi,

Node: Ⰹ (5627184805) with "name"="Ⰹ" "tourism"="viewpoint" "man_made"="telescope" "telescope:type"="Ⰹ" makes no sense.
Is this telescope for astronomical observations? if so is it an optical or a radio telescope?

??? A roundabout .. ??? What is that doing there?
Note - source not the LPI Base Map, nor any imagery.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The name=* tag should only be used for a name, not a description.
See the OSMwiki osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

landuse=yes means ? Nothing I can determine.

The building=* tag should outline the building it self .. not the block of land it resides on.

Ok? The OSM wiki if fairly good ..misses a few things, and use your own judgment rather than strictly follow it.

Geology is not a land use.
Not verifiable?

landgeology=* might be more fitting ... but I don't think it belongs in OSM.

Hi,
This water tower/storage tank - Way: 396875394... are you certain it is one? there is supposed to be a 12m radio telescope out here...

Hi,
For Way: 618045727 and Way: 618045728
You describe the antennas as 'disused'?

These are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauritius_Radio_Telescope
I have added the latest tagging for them. But .. disused... I don't know if they are disused.

Thanks. I only noticed this strange thing on the map and did not know what it was.. downloaded it to find out.

I do know there is a crossover somewheres around there .. you get the points noise/vibration. But I have no idea where it is even roughly. You'd have a much better idea of it than me.
Not certain the same can be said for whoever changed it to subway.. technically correct but .. I have not check their knowledge.

I do look forward to the completion .. at least of this stage. I'll have a ride a week or two after it opens .. let the alpha tests go first. I have not tried the 'station link buses' that 'replace trains' ... thanks but no thanks.

Hi,
I seem to be coming across a few of your entries with self intersecting ways...
e.g. way/589548822

There are probably more on
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=147.32372&lat=-35.63377&zoom=7&overlays=self_intersection_ways