Hi,
Adjusting the geometry to Ersi has put a kink in the road that is not there, placed the road so that is not relative to the other things - like buildings that are on the map. And the source on the road says bing.. which should have been changed to Ersi.

I have put the road back to bing. This way it is relatively correct to other things on the map.

Strava shows both bing and Ersi to be about right, possibly Ersi more centered. But if you want to displace the road then your going to have to displace everything ...big job.

Hi,
Way: 251900617 - you added the tag 'landuse=grass' yet it has the tag 'natural=wood'.

This means the area is covered by trees.
This also means the area is covered by grass.

Yet is cannot be both.

----------------------------
The Way: 251900617 needs work! Leave it to represent the trees. Possibly it needs to be a multipolygon relation with inners for grass and water. I have removed the grass tag.
Make one or more new ways for your grass.

Hi,
The relation for Central Qld Uni does not make OSM sense. type=building does not compute for a type of relation.

HI,
I think that level has been substituted for layer in tagging some of these features?

The gates with access=private should function. But, too be cautious, probably tag the roads too, assuming they are access=private ?

Hi,
The foot path that crosses several roads and a train line... what kind of crossing are they ? You have nodes on each crossing .. but are they 'uncontrolled'?
Way: 589146974

Hi,
I have removed the name=Walking Path.
The name is for the name only, not a description. The map should tell you it is a path for walking, just as it tells you there is a road.

Hi,
Looks to me like this 'track' is really a route made up of several tracks/cycleways.

Don't break roads that go through these gates. The routing engines should stop routings through he gates where the access=private is made. If they don't then the routing engines need fixing, bon't fudge the map to fix something else.

I've taken a look.
The trees overlap some fences and shelters.
4 netball courts are now parking.
Etc.
I have reduced the rendering area.
But have made a non rendering area for the legal area. It may be useful if they extend.
I have also add the Bradley Reserve to the south of here, as a park at this stage. I have taken it as the legal boundaries -difficult to do otherwise.

Hi,
You have marked the western most bit of Bathurst St as one way - meaning you cannot turn right into Lee Point Rd. Just checking that was what is intended.

At the moment a routing engine for a person on foot on the path has nowhere to go at the end. Not connected to the road so they cannot walk to it and then along the road. The only option they have is to walk back along the path.

Hi,
How does this walk way connect to East Bank Road? A the moment they dont connect.

Hi,
The two ways marked Yundamindra - Linden Road and Mount Celia Road over lap each other. Only one way should be there as there is only one road.
Please delete one of them where they overlap.

No source for the information. Possible copyright breach?
The nippers run has no permanent installation - just along the beach. Not verifiable.
Revert?

Sorry .. not an Id user so I cannot help there. (I use JOSM) Should be somewhere in an Id help thingy somewhere.

Hi,
Where a foot path crosses a road .. there needs to be a single node that connects both, otherwise they are not 'joined' and could be taken as separate layers. Then add to that single node the tag highway=crossing. Similar for cycle ways.

Hi,
Excellent change set description! Unfortunately the section you added is over the top of a remained of the way tagged as Jimma Crescent. What is best to do in this situation would have been to break the old way of Jimma into 2, and rename the relevant section to Cooroy.
I have fixed it by breaking the old way of Jimma into 2, and deleting the relevant section, this keeps the history fairly intact.

Hi,
The relation appears to be a a collection of trails, not a single route.

Hi,
Way: 626625841 amenity=parking crosses it self. That is not good. Seehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.94736&lat=-27.10649&zoom=16&opacity=0.84

You could make it into a multipologon .. or just 2 separate ways.