OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
33600543 over 10 years ago

Welcome to OSM, changes look good :)

Is there really an archaeological site separate from the castle itself ? If not, there should be only one OSM object.

Have a look at osm.wiki/Castle and start_date=* for more details to add to the castle building.

Oh, and resolve the note you opened if the problem is fixed.

Cheers.

33500805 over 10 years ago

According to my memory and http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/zDcF2czkoXHqbJStZ72Ejg/photo (which I took in April), you can go straight on here. That no_straight_through restriction also doesn't make sense from a traffic flow POV.

Can you point at your source ? Otherwise I'll remove that restriction. Please include detailed comments and source in your future changesets.

19666197 over 10 years ago

Can you give more details about Bog Bridge ? When I spoted that "bridge" I first thought it was a mishap. Add a surface tag and a note. Would embankment=yes be better than bridge=yes ? Maybe add paths leading to/from it and give it some Bing alignment love ?

33152447 over 10 years ago

jokes are supposed to be funny, this is just vandalism wasting everybody's time. I've reverted this and your other recent vandalism changesets.

You've been a productive contributor before as far as I can see. Please be that again, and find constructive ways to entertain yourself.

32582533 over 10 years ago

Comment for the original changeset:

IE, Kilkenny - Add guestimated city boundary, remove superfluous addr:city and GNS tags, move admin_center to a more central, less cluttered location. Currently all tags from the old node are duplicated on the relation, not sure if that's necessary.

32582533 over 10 years ago

Bleh - they were supposed to be two distinct changesets but network connection was bad, the first (less trivial) changeset was not closed, and then merged with this one, overwriting its comment.

32566645 over 10 years ago

I'd much rather create a polygon for the city boundary than add addr:city to all the addresses in there...

32232259 over 10 years ago

note/391936

32228292 over 10 years ago

Welcome to OSM, good first changeset :)

Two small nitpicks to improve things later on:
* Whenever possible, don't use abbreviations. The idea is that computers can abbreviate for us, but the reverse is much harder (is "st" for saint or "street" ? etc)
* A school is the whole grounds and buildings, not just the buildings. So the grounds have the school's name, not the school's courtyard's name. And the building gets at most an addr:housename, if it has an own name, like "O'Reilly building" or somesuch.

Check amenity=school for other tips. Some tags that I always try to add for schools is school=primary/secondary, religion/denomination, and male/female.

Enjoy your mapping :)

32187756 over 10 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM :)

I reverted this changeset because the golf course was already mapped, as an area rather than a node.

Go ahead and give it another shot :) Maybe you know the golf course's name, or you could fix the geometry/position of some of these ways that were traced using old badly-aligned imagery, or you could trace other details of the golf course ?

Don't hesitate to ask if you have questions.
osm.wiki/Golf
osm.wiki/Contact
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

27599099 over 10 years ago

1:25K GSGS 3906 gives "Fallavallgh" instead of "Fallavagh" as the alt_name for lough Ahusey. Was the name misread from GSGS, or is it yet another alternative name ?

31897964 over 10 years ago

Also, is Ce na Mara a different feature completely, or part of the hotel ?

31868396 over 10 years ago

Welcome to OSM :) You might want to chime in to the discussion at changeset/31897964

31897964 over 10 years ago

Some of these infos were perfectly adequate for OSM, so added them back. While at it, tweaked the geometry.

The tags also said that the street name is "new Dock Road", but that street doesn't seem to exist nearby. Is it the english name of "Bóthar na Long" maybe ? Worth checking.

31843602 over 10 years ago

Ok :) Du coup j'ai aussi retiré les tags qui correspondaient à l'ancien POI.

31843602 over 10 years ago

Le magasin est devenu une pizzeria ? Je ne trouve pas trace de la nouvelle activité sur internet, mais encore trace de l'ancienne, vous avez vérifié vous-même le changement ? Dans tous les cas, il reste des tags de l'ancienne version du noeud, il ne faut garder que les tags correspondant à l'activité courante.

31836812 over 10 years ago

Ok, y'a pas de mal. Essaye donc de faire des modifs utiles genre ajouter le bistro du coin s'il n'est pas déja là. C'est fun on se prend vite au jeu.

31836812 over 10 years ago

Modifs annulées. Si vous voulez expérimenter avec l'éditeur, utilisez le mode tutoriel. Et si vous voulez exprimer votre rage envers ce monde injuste, faites-le ailleur que dans un projet qui cherche à améliorer les choses. Ou encore mieux : canalisez votre énergie de manière constructive.

31530271 over 10 years ago

Pas bien grave surtout à cette échelle. C'est juste pour garder trace de l'historique. Et comme avec utilsplugin2 ça prend autant de temps de remplacer que de supprimer... ;)

31530271 over 10 years ago

En général il est préférable de modifier l'existant plutôt que de supprimer puis rajouter. Surtout s'il ne s'agit que de 2 batiments et que l'import qui suit est semi-automatique. La commande "Replace geometry" de UtilsPlugin2 rend la manip facile. Voir aussi "Join overlapping areas" pour ces sur-découpages du Cadastre qui n'ont pas de sens :)