Partial revert done in changeset/37142532 , keeping the good parts and restoring deleted stuff.

Please do not delete valid details from the map, other mappers have already complained to you about this in changeset/37062732 . There are for example quite a few issues with this changeset:

* You replaced the perfectly correct hotel area with a less-informative node.
* You removed lots of existing service roads.
* You changed the type of road from service to unclassified, which is wrong for these roads.
* You didn't include a changeset comment.

Adding the restaurant and parking, and improving the way geometry are good things. But you need to respect other contributors's work (don't delete stuff you think is not relevant enough, provide comments iin your changesets to make your intent more understandable) and to check on your tagging knowledge (the difference between service and unclassified, the mapping of a hotel area).

Cheers.

Nice, a townland mapped 5 years ago :) I hope you'll like the new version: relation/5913060

If you feel like getting back into mapping, now is as good a time as any. We're making great progress on townlands and, after years of work, expect to be done this summer : http://www.townlands.ie/

Cheers.

No worries, it happens. Don't hesitate to contact the contributor next time :)

Sorry for the tone of my first comment to your changeset: I was just after arguing against that proposal on the tagging mailing list and got annoyed when I saw my recent work undone.

As I have already argued on the mailing list and this changeset discussion, using name_1 and name_2 here is IMHO better than the alternatives.

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-January/028057.html and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-January/028125.html

Cheers.

Firstly, there are 3 names alltogether, I can't put two in loc_name (no, I don't want to use a semicolon).

Secondly, there's really nothing telling me that loc_name would be more appropriate than alt_name or old_name or name. They're just all names I know this place has, and I don't think classifying them using a *_name would make much sense.

Reverted.

No no no, what made you think these were typos ? I hope you're not making similar fixes elsewhere ?

They are alternate names, 3 variations in total, one official from GSGS and two from local knowledge.

I copy-pasted that text from note/480013 but thought I was more likely to reach you here. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have questions.

We could do with more contributors in County Cork, so I hope you'll start contributing again, removing those name tags being a first easy step :)

If something is a "natural=tree", there's no need to give it the name "Tree" as well. If something has no name, there's no need to create one just for OpenStreetMap. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for more details.

@Vincent de Phily/diary/37468

Hi, welcome to OSM :)

Adding this POI is a good start, but if you want it to show up on map renderings, searches, etc, you'll need to say what it *is* in addition to what it is *called*. I don't know the place, but you probably want to add "shop=door" or "shop=hardware" (osm.wiki/Shop). Other typical useful tags for shops are website and opening hours (osm.wiki/Opening_hours).

Another tweak: it's probably better to add the business park name to the business park object than as an addr:street tag to POIs. Firstly it is more generally-usefull (all POIs within the park now have this bit of addressing), and secondly there's no actual *street* call that, only the area is.

Cheers, and keep mapping :)

Smaller changeset area please :)

Also watch out: near Westport you removed a waterway's layer=-1 tag without adding the corresponding layer=1 on the bridge. Fixed.

Welcome to OSM :)

If a shop is no longer open, it's better to replace the "shop=*" tag with the corresponding "disused:shop=*" tag, otherwise it's still interpreted as a shop by renderer and other consumers. It's not the only way to express this, but I won't confuse you with options :p See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix , You can drop the opening_hours and operator tag too.

I had a look at your other edits; all good :)

Sorry, I don't agree with that change (healthcare:speciality -> health:speciality).

The heathcare:speciality tag is the documented one and used 7613 times, vs 6 times for health:speciality.

Please revert that change, unless you have a very convincing argument to transition obkects to the health:speciality tag.

Reverted in changeset/34044594

Please do not contribute private or fictional data. Names of private individual property owners are not recorded in OSM, at most we record the housename when it has one.

Unless you can show that the house is indeed named like this (ideally by puting a photo of the house's nameplate on Mapillary), this changeset will get reverted.

Are you sure about the Archer's Island place=locality ? Isn't it a duplicate of the place=island of the same name 150m east ?
node/3195994762
way/272116782

Welcome to OSM, good to see you're taking care of your shop's map data :)

Have a look at shop=bicycle you might want to add service:bicycle tags to your shop.

Also, it'd be good to move the POI inside the building. If Outdoor Escape occupies the whole building, you can even put the tags on the building rather than on a stand-alone node. To do that in iD, select both objects at the same time using shift, and click the "+" (merge) icon.

Happy mapping.

Reverted along with changeset/33646862

Sorry, but given the road layout and your past behavior, I don't belive this. Reverted. Upload a Mapillary photo of the streetsign if you contest this.

Please stop wasting people's time (including your own) with vandalism. If you want to edit OSM there are endless constructive ways to do so. Please communicate : answer changeset discussions, fill in changeset comments, send PMs, go on IRC or the forums, etc.