Thank you for the clarification. I understand and will not add foot=no tags going forward unless there is specific signage present prohibiting foot access.

Hi Pete,

I added foot=no tags here because foot traffic seemed meant to stay on the designated sidewalks next to this cycleway; the cycleway portion itself did not appear intended for pedestrians. I understand your concern regarding the absence of clear signage. Feel free to update the relevant ways as needed.

Thanks, VLD319

Hello Pete,

The foot=no tags that I added here were were meant to support pedestrian safety; All of the cycleway sections I added the tag to were in the roadway where it would be unsafe and unsuitable for foot traffic to walk (especially as there are designated crossings for pedestrians already at this intersection), so I thought that foot=no would be applicable. I do understand your point regarding the absence of explicit signage, so you are welcome update these features as you see fit.

Thanks, VLD319

Hello Pete,

Thank you for the information. My purpose here was only to fill in missing pedestrian ways, so the bicycle access was not my main focus. If you wish to include details regarding bicycle access to the sidewalks, please feel free to do so.

Thanks, VLD319

Description should say: Added marked zebra crossing tags to crossing way