Udarian's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172343352 | 3 months ago | the level something is on is better tagged using the level=*, for more info see level=* |
| 172223856 | 3 months ago | we are not supposed to use google as a source for our contributions as their license in proprietary and thus incompatible with OSM's, I point this out as this changeset (and looking further into it others from you) contain websites that have Google tracking parameters in them, which from my understanding only end up in a websites url if you came from google maps. |
| 172112022 | 3 months ago | Alton road seems to be the road that the whole of Mount Sinai is on which this building seems to be a part of so it makes sense that the addresses in here point to Alton Road. Ed Sullivan Drive seems to be the name of the road inside of the hospital grounds. |
| 172112022 | 3 months ago | we cannot use google as a source for OSM contributions but the Miami Dade County Data Hub "Address" database has this as being on "ALTON RD". |
| 172091540 | 3 months ago | next time please be more careful were you place crossings as you placed the crossing way across the wrong road as per Bing streetside. |
| 172091401 | 3 months ago | when you add footway=sidewalk to a footway please make sure that the whole footway is a sidewalk as way/367833252 is not by a simple look at the imagery. |
| 172086635 | 3 months ago | please, next time you add an apartment don't just add the name, please also add the relevant tags to mark it as an apartment, you can just search for apartment in iD and it will pop up. |
| 171953389 | 3 months ago | have you checked if this is the parking at this highschool that is for students, because then access=permissive may be more accurate. |
| 171811375 | 3 months ago | this parking seems to be for the court house so I am unsure if access=private is correct in this case, can you prove that this is only for employees or something, or could it also be for those that are defendants etc because then it may not be private. |
| 171811272 | 3 months ago | based on on the aerial imagery this looks like more of a parking you pay for not for any particular business so I am unsure if private is the best value. |
| 171813366 | 3 months ago | have you checked if any of the parking at this highschool is for student parking, because if there is access=private doesn't seem like the correct tag for the situation. |
| 171813637 | 3 months ago | these are clearly residential roads, just because there is parking along the road does not mean that it is a service road. |
| 171814188 | 3 months ago | have you checked if any of the ap0rking lots at this highschool allow student parking because it any do then access=private would be inaccurate. |
| 171817279 | 3 months ago | are you sure that this parking is not for LoanDepot Park, because if it is then I am not sure that access=private would be appropriate. |
| 171823735 | 3 months ago | if you look at the imagery this is a oneway |
| 171827727 | 3 months ago | looking at their website I do not think that access=no is warranted https://hachidoggrooming.com/ |
| 171624257 | 3 months ago | I am unsure this is private, do you have proof that this is only for private use because to me this seems more like public parking (maybe with a fee associated). |
| 171624551 | 3 months ago | this is staff parking so access=employees is correct. |
| 171624826 | 3 months ago | this is staff parking so access=employees is correct. |
| 171566980 | 4 months ago | Ok, I implemented a fix in 171597335, but I am not 100% sure of the tagging of the footways so I have brought it up in the OSMUS slack: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C6E4S4CQG/p1757267057670689 |