As for the addresses, I am sorry, I did not notice the fact that you had added the address to the construction area. I just saw address points being deleted and got worried, I will make sure to be more careful next time.
Happy mapping,
Udar.

You put bicycle=unknown on a footpath.

What’s your source for removing those addresses, does any official source not have them any more or did you just remove them as the building they were in previously was demolished as if that is the case they likely are still there virtually unless the county/city has removed them from their databases. Also “unknown” as an access tag value is highly discouraged, for more info see bicycle=* .

It is recommended that gates not be placed on the vertex were two roads meet.
Happy mapping,
Udar

whats your source for this

why did you move the position of the city of Miami.

on the latest imagery this area is under construction, has that completed or not. and looking further into the "Key Biscayne Shoreline" park this seems to be a proposal more then anything, and certainly does not seem like a features that exists at the moment. so why did you add this, what is your source, is this just something you saw on the news or is it actually there.

on the the latest street side imagery I don't see any path there, there are stairs but I doubt that a gulf cart can traverse that.

the horse=no is seemingly correct as I doubt that horses are allowed in this area, that tag is seemingly implied so honestly should have been removed.

I have already asked members of the Facebook team to stop splitting crossings off here as it is one continuous sidewalk all the way around and thus a single sidewalk way, no crossings. Please stop doing this.

I have already asked members of the Facebook team to stop splitting crossings off here as it is one continuous sidewalk all the way around and thus a single sidewalk way, no crossings. Please stop doing this.

why did you delete so meany buildings and benches (along with other features), whats you source for this.

you know that you can just drag a node to a better position instead of deleting the old node and adding a new one. In fact it is generally advised to do so that the history of the node is better kept. For more info see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

you know that you can just drag a node to a better position instead of deleting the old node and adding a new one. In fact it is generally advised to do so that the history of the node is better kept. For more info see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

you know that you can just drag a node to a better position instead of deleting the old node and adding a new one. In fact it is generally advised to do so that the history of the node is better kept. For more info see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

you know that you can just drag a node to a better position instead of deleting the old node and adding a new one. In fact it is generally advised to do so that the history of the node is better kept. For more info see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

you know that you can just drag a node to a better position instead of deleting the old node and adding a new one. In fact it is generally advised to do so that the history of the node is better kept. For more info see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

you know that you can just drag a node to a better position instead of deleting the old node and adding a new one. In fact it is generally advised to do so that the history of the node is better kept. For more info see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

you know that you can just drag a node to a better position instead of deleting the old node and adding a new one. In fact it is generally advised to do so that the history of the node is better kept. For more info see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

you know that you can just drag a node to a better position instead of deleting the old node and adding a new one. In fact it is generally advised to do so that the history of the node is better kept. For more info see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history