please respond

Agreed

Based on the latest aerial and street side imagery I doubt that this is private since there aren’t any gates anywhere on or leading to this road.

based on the latest aerial and streetside imagery (Bing both) there is one, please check with all the imagery before deleting a way next time.

this is incorrect as on the latest imagery there are service roads here so that track should been converted to serviced road not deleted.

I have pointed this out before, if there is not sign for whether or not bikes are allowed on a road (or sidewalk/crossing) it is implied to be access of the way. so in this case "bicycle=not designated" would be the same as bicycle=commercial since this road would likely be access=commercial. please stop doing this.

* and Southwest 84th Avenue

this is incorrect, if you look at the latest imagery (the Bing areal imagery) there is a small stub of road their meaning that likely after construction is complete on what ever their building on that lot there will be a service road there so as to maintain history we should keep that way until construction completes and extend it to the new aliment at that time.

looking further into other edits made by this account it seems like this and many other changeset's produced by this account are vandalism. many of the roads and buildings added/edited by this account have alignments that aren't aligned to any available imagery (in iD) in the area. so either this contributor is adding buildings have been built within the last year (or possibly less) or this is vandalism. this is especially clear at Lake Mead were were edits made by this account in two different commits create geometry that I severely doubt the correctness of. If the Lake Mead edits are "correct" as in their not vandalism then they are extremely sloppy to the point were there is at least 1 multipolygon loop in the geometry that I saw.
This user has also added residential areas that have really odd shapes and residential roads that are in the middle of nowhere and do not connect to other roads that intersect with them. all of this compounds to making me think that most if not all of the edits by this user are vandalism.

I am just not 100% sure since most of the edits I saw from this account when looking through on OSMCha are in Las Vegas and Buenos Aires which are cities I know next to nothing about so I cant tell what's being built were. but still based on the edits them selves this account seems to be doing vandalism.

this seems to be vandalism to me, I don't know the area but I doubt that changes like this would happen; and if there is some truth to this the geometry is really sloppy so someone with local knowledge should give this a second look.

two notes here:
first next time can you please leave a better changeset comment, for more information see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

second next time try to not have the bounding box of the changeset spanning multiple continents or even countries, try to keep them local.

next time please leave a changeset comment describing what you did in the commit, for more information see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

A few points here:
first of all, the tag "bicycle=not specified" is not used anywhere else according to taginfo. this means that this is something you made up, there is no community consensus on this and thus probably shouldn't be used. there is also the fact that if there is not sign explicitly not allowing bikes on a way the assumed value is that it is the same as the normal access on the way. for Miami dade the defaults for public sidewalks is "access=yes".

the second issue is that you added access=permissive on way/1144585259 which is in the public facing part of the zoo so would in actuality be "access=customers;employees" because that way is only allowed for customers who payed to get in to the zoo and employees of the zoo.

Could you please respond
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155391150

Please stop removing tracks when they are visible from the latest imagery.

small question,

is the "Binker Classroom" just a hystorical classroom or is it a museum of sort, I ask because since I have never been there it seems to me like this may be better tagged on a way (or multipolygon if you please) as:
indoor=room
room=classroom
name=Binker Classroom
level=*

you obviously know the area better so feel free to ignore this if this doesn't apply or you don't feel like micro-mapping to that degree. I am pointing this out because it is generally frowned upon to have nodes with just names without something more descriptive in the tagging (describing what the node isn't used for).

happy mapping,
Udar

The building of Dadeland Station should include the parking garage because the parking garage is for Dadeland station and thus is part of it. That’s why I tagged it as building:part rather then splitting it.

Happy mapping,
Udar

Small note, to me way/1311400828 looks more like a bike path then a service road especially because were it meets way/1311400829 there seems to be tactile paving of some sort there. Just a small note

Happy mapping,
Udar.

you know you placed this inside of a post office. this means that this is almost certainly incorrectly placed.

also what is the source for this commit?

Happy mapping,
Udar.

residential landuse should be mapped as on large area like the way you deleted in this commit, this is because the whole area (including the roads) is residential, not just the part with the homes, the whole of it. land use is ultimately mostly decided by the county and the developers, we just map what they decided. OSM is a map of the world as it is, so we must endeavor to map the world as it is, this is why we shouldn't map landuse as individual small areas but as the whole area because what land is used for what is decided by the county in the zoning and use of the various areas and when mapping land use that is what we are mapping and the land that the roads are on is still part of the land that is being used as part of the neighborhood which is the larger area.

if you have any comments feel free to contact me seperatly.

happy mapping,
Udar.