is it 1 or 2 atm's

please respond

please respond

please respond

please respond

what is the source for this commit??

because by a cursory glance at the various features added I have a feeling that at least part of this commit is additions that do not exist in reality. for example this commit adds English named hot5els/guest houses in the middle of Africa, while its possible that such a thing exists I doubt that it is real. this also adds a dog park that when you look at the default imagery layer for the area (somewhere in Nebraska) seems to be in the middle of a marsh or swamp of some sort, so unless some construction has happened in the area since the imagery updated (I dont know when it last updated) that along with the fact that the feature is called doggy park which doesn't seem like a name for a park (from my experience in the US they usually are named after a person, movement etc. and not just their purpose alone).

typo:
tagging not raging

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Quick question,
Is the atm added in this 1 atm for both Wells Fargo and Bank of America or does this represent 2 separate atm’s one Wells Fargo and the other Bank of America?
Happy mapping.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.