a few issues here, first of all as it is right now this is just a point with out an amenity of other identifying tag, this is an issue as those are required to make an item in OSM useful. The closest I can think of is a non profit office but that is iffy.
Second, I doubt that such a feature would be located in the middle of a school.
Third, you certainly should not have attached it to the vertex of the running track area.
You also have several dragged nodes in this commit.

The question becomes what is this feature supposed to be, because I have a feeling OSM doesn't currently have a tag for this, but we may be able to come up with something if you provide more info as a response.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

can you please give the geometry of way/39348297 another look as I doubt the angle at the end there is correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

Thank you, it does seem like a large parking lot, to be completely honest I expected this to become a residential area but I guess not.

please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

While I agree that 1916775 was overly complicated and I fixed it I do not agree with the rest, I personally find multipolygons easier to maintain and deal with for land use then areas, plus it minimizes the amount of duplicate faces in the land use. I will deal with any breakages my self. I will ensure that I check tools like osmi more often to check for these kinds of issues.

please stop doing the tasks below Dolphin Expressway (relation/192469) as the tasks between dolphin and US1 are going to be part of a task I have been working of creating for like 8 months now and the allot of the roads south of US 1 are not properly alignment yet and once pedestrian is added to an area it becomes at minimum twice as time consuming and complicated to fix road alignments, so please stop doing these.

When I try to view the file it tells me I don’t have access to it.

I have some issues with this, while I agree with the access changes, and I can't believe that I missed the bicycle=not specified when it was added, what you did to the pedestrian features at Southwest 104th Street and Southwest 72nd Avenue is very incorrect in my opinion. The reason for this, is that I try to map Miami Dade's pedestrian infra to a silver tier of geometry, that is what that intersection what mapped to, for more info see osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Schemab . There is also the fact that crossings ways are only defined within the road area, mapping a crossing way into the sidewalk area is thus incorrect.

Thank you so much for the understanding,

Udar.

are you sure that these are service roads as this looks more like a residential development (last time I drove by (around a year ago)).

kerb vertexes should not be placed on sidewalk centerlines

kerb vertexes should not be placed on sidewalk centerlines

I don't know if local knowledge applies when you edited objects in multiple countries, so why did you change multiple shop=convenience to shop=tortilla, how do you know that those stores only sell tortilla's; if it's just the names I don't know if that is enough.

that vertex should be higher so that it is in the centerline.

this is directly on top of an already mapped gym, does this mean that the "Rumble" boxing gym is no longer there, if not is this on the second floor or what.

you linked the website for the miami dade county website, Miami dade county is a much larger area then Kendall so I um unsure if this is a good idea to use it for Kendall.

please respond

the two tags added to this object
"
addr:housenumber=400
name=ParkLine Miami South
"
simply do not give enough information about this object, from what I can tell from some cursory searches on duck duck go this seems to be a apartment so it would needs tags for that.

There is also the issue that you put source=survey on this even though you are adding other objects throughout the US that are also source survey so I am starting to doubt that, I would really like a more in depth explanation as to how you are finding all these objects throughout the US.

Your change set comment could also be better, for more info on that see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

Happy mapping,
Udar

Also we are not supposed to use short codes for road types like Blvd for Boulevard