I have asked you this before, when you add landuse attached to multipolygons, please do that landuse as multipolygons.

I have asked you this before, when you add landuse attached to multipolygons, please do that landuse as multipolygons.

it is one multipolygon as it is the grass along the right of way of Don Shula expressway from Southwest 56th street to Southwest 87th avenue

in June I mapped the grass and shrubbery along Don Shula (in this area) and part of that was relation relation/19302801 , in this commit you attached you residential land use that was mapped as an area to that relation which in most cases makes it significantly harder to work with since area attached to relations are harder to work with.
All I am asking is next time (when doing this in Miami) check if what you are mapping is attached to existing multipolygons mapped by others and if so do your work in multipolygon as a courtesy to the local mappers in Miami doing there best to make the map in our area the best it can be. After all multipolygons are the best way to do land use as they are significantly easier to maintain and fix when the land use changes, plus they reduce the amount of duplication in the data.

next time you add land use attached to already mapped land use that is done as multipolygons please do your land use as multipolygon.

why did you remove the wikidata and Wikipedia links as they seem to be correct.

next time please leave a better change set comment describing what you did in the change set, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

also I was wondering why you added ways without tags as ways without tags are not very useful as they do not tell you much of anything about the object

Happy mapping,
Udar

are you sure that little italia is no longer in business.

what was the source for the road names.

so then what floor is "The Gallery At Bay Harbor" on or is that the name of the building part with each of these floors

question about node node/6027891152 , does that mean that the office takes up the whole fifth floor, or am I misunderstanding that.

Based on the description of way/769421858 does that mean that it does not have any name at all or does it have some other name?

Happy mapping,
Udar.

As for the addresses, I am sorry, I did not notice the fact that you had added the address to the construction area. I just saw address points being deleted and got worried, I will make sure to be more careful next time.
Happy mapping,
Udar.

You put bicycle=unknown on a footpath.

What’s your source for removing those addresses, does any official source not have them any more or did you just remove them as the building they were in previously was demolished as if that is the case they likely are still there virtually unless the county/city has removed them from their databases. Also “unknown” as an access tag value is highly discouraged, for more info see bicycle=* .

It is recommended that gates not be placed on the vertex were two roads meet.
Happy mapping,
Udar

whats your source for this

why did you move the position of the city of Miami.

on the latest imagery this area is under construction, has that completed or not. and looking further into the "Key Biscayne Shoreline" park this seems to be a proposal more then anything, and certainly does not seem like a features that exists at the moment. so why did you add this, what is your source, is this just something you saw on the news or is it actually there.

on the the latest street side imagery I don't see any path there, there are stairs but I doubt that a gulf cart can traverse that.