whats the source for this commit?

whats the source for this as from the aerial imagery available in the area it does not seem as if planes can enter these, these seem more like warehouses were cargo/mail is taken of of planes and put in trucks, so I don't think the "aeroway=hangar" tag is correct here.

at Leonard Usina Hall of Science at MDC Kendall

whats the source for this commit.

why did you add the "aeroway=bldg" as this does not seem to be an existing tag according to taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/aeroway#values , what is this tag
supposed to mean? also, what is you source for this commit?

from a cursory look all the navigational aids added in this commit as ways were already mapped as vertexes, why did you do this?

whats the source for this

sorry forgot to add the last part of the changeset comment, it was supposed to be:
"micromap shape and convert to multipolygon the rooms at Jack Kassewitz Building at MDC Kendall Campus"

why did you remove the operator tag, even if its wrong you shouldn't just remove the tag, same with the operator:type=* tag.

All three of this contributors commits seem shifty, all of the websites they link aren't up at this point in time and using the wayback machine they look very shifty and do not seem to be selling what the tags on these objects make it seem as if they are. Allot of the names of businesses are seemingly from video games and the new businesses added as areas have very suspicious geometry, aka a building in the middle what is in reality inside of a sidewalk area.

ok, thank you
that clarifies everything, you seem to have been correct.

Happy mapping,
UDar

is this based on a difference between the aerial imagery lyft has access to (nearmap) and the ones in iD (like bing) or would this commit still be the same if done based on bing, I ask because on the bing this doesn't look correct as there isn't enough of a barrier between the carriageways so that it would warrant splitting it up like this.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

As in they have completely torn down the traffic lights that used to be there, or is it still there. Because unless they are completely removing the road (which I doubt as it is for through traffic very clearly) and placing a building or something like that in its place, there is still going to be traffic lights at this intersection. And I will reiterate that “noexit”’s shouldn’t be placed in the middle of a road as you have.

Why did you remove the traffic light from Northwest 13th Court as I doubt that they would completely remove the traffic light even if there is construction on the road.
Why did you add the no exit in the middle of the road, those generally only go at the end of a road, if there is a section of Northwest 13th court that is under-construction then that segment should be split and from the rest and tagged as under construction.
again I have to ask what the source is as allot of the commits on Northwest 13th Court is not on the imagery (aerial or streetside) so there must be some other source.

whats the source for this, there seems to be some construction in the area but not all the way across the canal to Nothwest 13th Court.

next time please leave a better change set comment, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

three points here, first next time please leave better change set comments, for more info see:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
things like swimming pools and land use are best mapped as areas, please stop adding these as points. third, I doubt that a tennis pitch has a address, that address is part of the building not only for the tennis pitch so please stop adding info to addresses when those addresses are not only pointing to the feature.

Happy mapping,
Udar

next time please check if the feature you are adding already exists as this was already mapped.

next time you add land use please add it as an area.

next time you add land use please add it as an area.