As in they have completely torn down the traffic lights that used to be there, or is it still there. Because unless they are completely removing the road (which I doubt as it is for through traffic very clearly) and placing a building or something like that in its place, there is still going to be traffic lights at this intersection. And I will reiterate that “noexit”’s shouldn’t be placed in the middle of a road as you have.

Why did you remove the traffic light from Northwest 13th Court as I doubt that they would completely remove the traffic light even if there is construction on the road.
Why did you add the no exit in the middle of the road, those generally only go at the end of a road, if there is a section of Northwest 13th court that is under-construction then that segment should be split and from the rest and tagged as under construction.
again I have to ask what the source is as allot of the commits on Northwest 13th Court is not on the imagery (aerial or streetside) so there must be some other source.

whats the source for this, there seems to be some construction in the area but not all the way across the canal to Nothwest 13th Court.

next time please leave a better change set comment, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

three points here, first next time please leave better change set comments, for more info see:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
things like swimming pools and land use are best mapped as areas, please stop adding these as points. third, I doubt that a tennis pitch has a address, that address is part of the building not only for the tennis pitch so please stop adding info to addresses when those addresses are not only pointing to the feature.

Happy mapping,
Udar

next time please check if the feature you are adding already exists as this was already mapped.

next time you add land use please add it as an area.

next time you add land use please add it as an area.

next time you add land use please add it as an area.

next time you add land use please add it as an area.

I have two questions here, first what does "amenity=toilets + wetland=mangrove" even mean in this context, is it a restroom or a tree, the second question is the "natural=wetland + represent a single tree or meany trees in an area.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

is the piece of sidewalk under construction a completely different parallel segment to the already mapped one, or is part of the already mapped segment parallel under construction?

happy mapping,
Udar

As I mentioned in my second comment I copied the ownership_type=* value from the ATP website, I knew I had seen that tag as an option in the main ID left side panel so I assumed that what ever ATP was providing was at least somewhat correct, I already knew opening hours, fuel type and address tagging stuff but that I have no clue. It seams that this tag comes from the following code file https://github.com/alltheplaces/alltheplaces/blob/master/locations/spiders/starbucks_us.py and it seems the PR that added the tag to the output was https://github.com/alltheplaces/alltheplaces/pull/4404 . Again I have no clue, if you want I can remove the tag right now I have nothing against that, I added the tag because it was on the ATP website, my bad.

I don’t know what that specific tag means I just added what was there, I wont add that tag in the future if its bogus.

Sorry, I was in a bit of a hurry when I was finishing this commit off so I forgot to add as a source to the commit that I used All The Places for this commit to add extra information like addresses, opening hours and fuel type (information that isn’t easy to survey in) to the businesses in this commit.

whats the source for this as there doesn't seem to be any buildings that this could be in on the imagery in the area.

also please leave better change set comments:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
a hashtag doesn't tell me much.

What I keep stating is my personal experience, a few years back back I was at the intersection of Southwest 107th Avenue and Southwest 84th Street (node/99259757) waiting to cross way/1103957961, the traffic lights for way/1132669471 had turned red but the signal for the pedestrians to go had yet to start counting down (at this intersection its like 5 seconds between the light turning red and pedestrian being able to cross as they give cars turning right from way/11160411 a little time to go before allowing pedestrians), there was a cop car on the lane closest to the sidewalk waiting at the stop line and a small family on bikes came behind me and waited behind me (the whole time on the sidewalk), it was at least another 2-3 seconds before the signal for pedestrians turned (the timer turned on) and the cop did nothing about the bikes even though they were clearly there. This was not the only time I saw bikes riding on the sidewalk as I was walking along, there are more instances of this happening then I can count. I have also done a little bit of research of my own on this matter as I have considered biking to the MDC Kendal, were I have classes, and I found nothing to show that pedestrians aren't allowed on sidewalks, and in fact from what I can tell in Fl bikes are fully allowed on sidewalks, they have to yield to pedestrians but they are legally allowed.

highway=cycleway is specifically for bikes and not for pedestrians the foot=* and bicycle=* is for "Cycle & Foot Path"'s so logically without the foot=* and bicycle=* it is solely for bikes. Also, at least here in miami dade county bikes are allowed on sidewalks unless they have specific painted or otherwise facilities (like lanes) on the road, which are highway=footway, which if those separate facilities are available they should use those.

I don't see why this was reverted as it basically fixes the issues with changeset/162800365
, by making the bicycle=* and foot=* `=designated;private` it ensures that these ways are properly tagged as private while keeping the fact that these are bicycle and foot paths and leaving them as just highway=cycleway does not properly get across this fact.