If you tell me which one is the correct one I’ll remove the other one.

Which one of the currently mapped locations is the correct one, the one in the building with The Netherlands Consulate General in Miami or the other one

please respond

next time please leave better changeset comments, for more info see:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I am certain loanDepot Park hasn't had its location changed, and it is even more unlikely that it would move into downtown.

changeset/161995732

there is no way this is correct

does this mean you have two offices right next to each other because that doesn't sound right.

issues with navigation software should not be fixed by removing the address of the airport from the feature. we don't map for data consumers we map what actually exists

please respond

what is your source for the oneway's because unless you have access to different bing imagery then me (the ones in iD) there is nothing to imply oneway, these likely are oneway but non of the available imagery shows that and thus unless you went to this location in person adding oneway like this isn’t warranted until there is newer imagery or some other source showing the oneway in this location.

paths inside of the customer facing part of the zoo (around the exhibits) are access=customers because they are for customers, please stop marking these as private.

I already pointed this out previously but bicycle=designated is the correct tag for a bicycle and footpath which is what these are so please stop changing this.

If you want to mark the ways as under construction or access=no I'm indifferent, if that's what you feel is best feel free.

to be honest, I'm not sure what the best rout is myself. I updated to have the section under the building and up to were there isn't any asphalt in the Bind imagery(the latest in this part of Miami-Dade)with a note describing the issues and added a crossing were it should end up roughly being based on the imagery. I already had a note in the area describing things roughly note/3818829 .
I am decently sure that the busses go though there since the bus routes apparently go through there (according to the Miami-Dade county website) and those were last updated in July of 2024. https://www.miamidade.gov/transit/library/routes/38.pdf so it may be the case that the bicycle and footpath also is open through there and I am not sure.
I'm ok keeping it as is, I'd estimate it will be roughly until July of August before there is new imagery in Miami-Dade county. the one that will likely update around then is the Miami-Dade County Orthoimagery (Latest), they tend to update the imagery yearly around that time. as a note the imagery isn't from July or August its from December 31 2023 currently but they don't post it until July or august. So the new one likely has been taken but will not be posted until July or August. when that happens I'll check this area again for any updates. the following might get the new imagery before it it becomes available in iD:
https://mdc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=e523627bb1a748408f7f61aae1bbbfd0

any other sources.

that site doesn't show anything about construction on this road, I checked.

a few typos were fixed:
a few questions here:
1. are you sure that the bike305 site is license complaint with OSM and thus can be used as a source
2. what building are you talking about that has been demolished, before construction there wasn't really any building here and their building a parking garage along with the new station here.
3. third since that bike305 website is a Miami-Dade county website I wouldn't trust it to be all that up to date and accurate since I have personally found meany data inaccuracies with their sites in the passed and within the last few months. so I was wondering if you used any other sources because the Bing aerial imagery doesn't show the bike path existing around the construction (it physically isn't visible(no asphalt)) and having driven through last august I am almost certain that the alignment around the crossing is very incorrect.

In general Miami-Dade only pretends to care about pedestrians, they will go out of their way to ensure that cars can still navigate through and area while all pedestrian infrastructure will be inaccessible while construction happens so it is very likely that this gap in the route actually exists until they complete the BRT line. as of November of last year it is 87% complete, for more info see https://www.miamidade.gov/global/transportation/smart-plan-south-dade-transit-way-corridor.page

I don't see anything about this on that site

a few questions here:
1. are you sure that the bike305 site is license complaint with OSM and thus can be used as a source
2. what building are you talking about that has been demolished, before construction there wasn't any building here and their building a parking garage along with the new station here.
3. third since that bike305 website is a Miami dade county website I wouldn't trust it to be all that up to date and accurate since I have personally found meany issues with their sites in the passed and within the last few months. so I was wondering if you used any other sources because the Bing aerial imagery doesn't show the bike path existing around the construction (it fiscally isn't visible(no asphalt)) and having driven through last august I am almost certain that the alignment around the crossing is very incorrect.

In general Miami dade only pretends to care about pedestrians, they will go out of their way t6o ensure that cars can still navigate through and area while all pedestrian infrastructure will be inaccessible while construction happens so it is very likely that this gap in the route actually exists until they complete the BRT line. as of November of last year it is 87% complete, for more info see https://www.miamidade.gov/global/transportation/smart-plan-south-dade-transit-way-corridor.page

whats the source for this?