Udarian's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 158953471 | about 1 year ago | please in the future do not add the crossing:signals=* because it is implied the by the crossings=* value; this is because crossings=uncontrolled and crossing=unmarked both imply that the crossings isn't signalized (aka crossing:signals=no)(literally the definition of uncontrolled in this context) and crossings=traffic_signals implies crossing:signals=yes because that means that the crossings has signals. Happy mapping,
|
| 158802545 | about 1 year ago | as a note, the refs are at least somewhat incorrect, I don't know how to check what they should be, I just traced based on newest imagery. |
| 158683112 | about 1 year ago | next time please don't remove footway=sidewalk from ways along the side of a road (even if it is a service roads) that are tagged as sidewalks. |
| 158678681 | about 1 year ago | the bicycle=designated foot= designated means that this is bicycle and foot path specifically marking those as private stops that, also these aren't for cars so the general access=private doesn't really apply to the bicycle and foot paths. |
| 158468109 | about 1 year ago | what the source for this because on the Bing aerial imagery Okeechobee Frontage Road connects between the two carriageways of Northwest 138th Street Extension. |
| 158370879 | about 1 year ago | sorry miss read the changeset comment, my brain registered "colour = White -> roof:colour = white" instead of what you write, my bad. I'll be more careful next time. |
| 158370879 | about 1 year ago | were these checked with aerial imagery before uploading, I ask because some of these may be the color of the walls of the building not the roof. |
| 157893178 | about 1 year ago | as mentioned previously we (OSM) don't have the right to use Waze data as a source and since that is the source for this commit I have reverted it, for more info see osm.wiki/Waze . |
| 157991991 | about 1 year ago | I saw a world spanning commit so I translated the changeset comment to see if it properly described what was in the commit and it wasn't so I left the comment about that and because from my experience when there are geographically large commits made by new contributors there's a high chance of the commits being vandalism so I translated some of the name changes to check. the changed names came out sus so I left a comment pointing out that there's possibly an issue here so that someone with more experience and knows the language can check them and see if they are vandalism. I just didn't call it vandalism from the get go since from other commits you seems to be mostly well intentioned so I left it implied. I was just tying to be nice about it, I always like to give others the benefit of the doubt on these things unless it is really clear what it is. it isn't ignorance to point out possible vandalism, the whole point of me pointing out that I don't know the language was to point out that there might be vandalism in this commit and other who know the language can fix any issues; ignorance would be me calling it vandalism without pointing out that I don't know the language.
|
| 157938999 | about 1 year ago | please respond |
| 157991655 | about 1 year ago | it seams like the changes made to the names of these countries translate to completely nonsensical things |
| 157991991 | about 1 year ago | next time can you please leave a better changeset comment, for m ore info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
|
| 157987279 | about 1 year ago | I understand that, I was just making sure, but ya, feel free to change the name of that segment of old cutler. |
| 157980003 | about 1 year ago | did you use something like Bing streetside to see the signs or Waze again. |
| 157987279 | about 1 year ago | then we change the name of the road and close note/3071873 once that's done since the osmi issues were why I opened and kept open that note. also we cant use google as a source since google hasn't given us (OSM) the right to use their data in OSM so it cant be used as a source. |
| 157987279 | about 1 year ago | the problem with using "West Old Cutler Road" for the road name for addresses is that there is no road named like that in the area, its named "Old Cutler Road" not "West Old Cutler Road", so this causes data issues, for more info see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-80.36635&lat=25.56076&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=buildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way%2Cbuildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way . |
| 157978640 | about 1 year ago | did you use something like Bing streetside to see the signs or Waze again. |
| 157980003 | about 1 year ago | whats the source for this? |
| 157978640 | about 1 year ago | whats the source for this? |
| 157938999 | about 1 year ago | What’s the source for this? |