starting off with a slight disclaimer here, I do not know the area but, why did you completely remove all data from Alabama River Parkway, what is the source for this. since data such as name=Alabama River Parkway, and toll=no are completely valid data. also dont just remove name_1, convert it to alt_name (for more info see osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Key:name_1).

from what I can tell traffic signals should not have toll information on them, like what would that even mean, that there's a camera on it, then there is specific tagging for that and thus should be used over toll=yes. also what is the source for this.

I am a little confused here, Maneesh Mahlawat you said "Thank you for reverting this change" yet this data is still there, who reverted what, I dont see any such reverts.

before this was committed it had toll=no, what source do have as to that changing.

I have never been in the area, but I doubt that secondary and tertiary roads have a toll on them, I may be wrong. it is important to note that on of the roads already had toll=no on it so it makes me skeptical about this commit. someone with local knowledge or that can survey this information should take a look at this and see if it is accurate.

for the committer, what is the source for all of this.

question, what is the source for all of this.

thank you so much for taking your time to contribute towards making OSM as good as possible, I just have one small note here. next time you commit could you please leave a better change set comment, something describing what you did. for this commit it would be something like "added stop signs to EPCOT parking lot and specified position of disabled parking", this is so that other who are looking at the commits know what they are looking at from the get go. for more information see the following wiki page: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

question, why did you remove the Arsenicker Keys, from what I can tell these exist, for reference see the Wikipedia article on them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenicker_Keys

yes, please provide more detail change set comments

next time you commit can you please leave a more descriptive comment. "." doesn't really tell others what you did in a commit. for more information see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

I typoed at the end of the message. there is still work needed in the area though this commit deals with some of the most misaligned roads in the area.

work still needed in the area, mostly on TIGER realignment though some sidewalks and foot paths also have poor alignments

next time please leave a comment describing what you have done in the commit, for more information see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

also, added new construction site and removed most of the existent mapped data, there was some I didn't remove because although the existent bicycle and bus ways seam to be bulldozed I dont want to mess up the relations for the bus and bicycle routs.

I have left multiple messages trying to clarify that google data cannot be used due to its proprietary nature with osm not having the right to importing it to any capacity. you have been unresponsive, since osm license non compliant sources cannot remain in osm this commit has to be reverted.

changeset/139277612

I have left comments explaining the problems with the commits on these commits and have received no responses. this has left me no option but to revert.

changeset/139277250

I have left comments explaining the problems with the commits on these commits and have received no responses. this has left me no option but to revert.

changeset/139277250

also as a note, the geometry isn't that good as it was in some areas on the island but that doesn't mean that we just remove it altogether and not at least add anything back. I dont currently have the time to fix the island up correctly so I'm just leaving this as a note here.

I couldn't fit this on the original commit message, so I'm putting it here. I also left multiple commit messages on the original commit getting no response.

I have left multiple comments asking you what the source of the deletions are and you have been unresponsive. since from what I can tell these features still exist I have had to revert this commit

changeset/139276928