It's an AWRC catchment boundary, which is what the industry uses. See http://www.bom.gov.au/water/about/riverBasinAuxNav.shtml

There was an extensive discussion on the talk-au mail list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-February/014350.html. Maybe if you want to debate the outcome you could continue it there.

Welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution. You asked for a review and what you have done looks fine. It would appear that another mapper copied this "road" off a map without checking the aerial imagery to see if it exists.

Happy Mapping.

Also the north bound lanes are oneway in the wrong direction.

Nev did the original tagging. All I did was add a fixme and a cadid.

They can be vague about it as it's effect is to limit how much water they can get down the Murray below the Edward. So it's a bit moot about whether the choke is 1 m or 80 km long, it has the same effect on river operations.

It's a pretty vague term, but the MDBA usually is referring to the reach from Bullatale Ck to Barmah township when they talk about the "choke":

https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/barmah-millewa-forest-sediment-transport-investigation.pdf

You can see that the channel doubles in width between Cutting Ck and the township, so I'd agree that it's unlikely people would be referring to places downstream of Barmah.

The Narrows are a sub-section of the Choke and may warrant their own label.

For future reference 3 is not "numerous". From your original comment I thought there was supposed to be a real problem. If you had said 3 (which apparently you knew) then I would not have bothered to waste my time checking to see what the problem was.

Are you using the DCS imagery? Except for a short segment near Minmi Rd these footpaths are visible on the imagery. Are you saying that they have been removed?

No I'm wrong the changeset you're looking for is changeset/78111434

78308788 was removing the construction tag.

This link was "declared" open in this changeset: changeset/78308788

Might be better to ask them?

I've put the Enfield State Park back to where it should be. Also fixed up Enfield State Forest at the same time (and tagged it forest). Also had to restore the boundaries of Jubilee Historic Area.

Should be fixed now.

They are documented on the page you linked to. However I noticed that someone has replaced protect class 1 with 1a and 1b. These were never a thing and only appeared when people tagged incorrectly.

In general AUS is no different to anywhere else. A conservation area managed to a IUCN Category is 1 through 6 (and we have permission to use a national dataset of these, so you can just look them up). If it's a conservation are without an IUCN Cat then 7. Historic areas 22. Catchment protection areas 12. Then the rest are pretty rare. There are some class 24 but a quick look suggests these are incorrectly tagged. Some no fishing areas tagged 14. And two "character preservation" districts in SA which are 29 because that's the closest class to what they do.

Everything in protect class 1 to 7 also gets a leisure=nature_reserve because....OSM

This isn't protect_class 5 either. As I said in AUS if something is Cat V it would be listed on CAPAD. This isn't listed.

Hi,
Historic areas are protect class 22 not 5. If something is IUCN cat V in Australia they'd be listed on CAPAD, which neither of these are.

Thanks.

This is only true in areas where the required boundaries have been mapped. In other places your mileage may vary.

All of the components of the address below addr:street can be worked out from the administrative boundaries. So you only need to put in the street name and things above such as street number and unit number.

Nominatim works quite well without duplicating all of the address details for example: https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/reverse.html?format=html&lat=-35.30758&lon=149.13749&zoom=18

Unlikely to be due to this changeset as it is only adding tags.

the problem is that the DCS Base Map has "green areas" for any Crown Reserve but it is not possible to get any data as to what purpose they have been reserved. For example the area around Wynnes Lookout has been reserved for "Trigonometrical Purposes".

this document https://www.nswlrs.com.au/getattachment/99aaebb8-d53d-40b1-a18c-2d2fff6c3c2f/attachment.aspx has a list on p.31 of everything that appears as a green area on the base map.