Tech Dec's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 166545411 | 4 months ago | Thanks Mateusz. Not sure how or why I added that, when there was an existing wikidata tag (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5445742) on it already. |
| 66794219 | 8 months ago | Sorry for digging up such an old changeset Andrew, but isn't this a real business address? I checked their website https://www.levelmaster.com.au/about-us/ and it appears that their office is indeed located here. Sure the description could be removed, but all other address, name, hours, contact info, could be kept right?
|
| 161332055 | 11 months ago | Hey nevw. I can't see any issues in geofabrik. I checked each filter but there's nothing displaying. I realise now you've fixed it in changeset #161401170 thank you! Silly mistake on my part. I know not to do that in future. |
| 157576728 | about 1 year ago | Hi Tanker3278, thank you for the map contributions. OpenStreetMap changeset comments serve as a way to better understand the changes other mappers make - collaboration is crucial. Could you please consider writing more informative comments instead of "Location Updates"?
|
| 157162338 | about 1 year ago | Hey Dondayevsky, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
| 155264053 | about 1 year ago | This changeset has been reverted as Scrubby Creek is not a canal or canal lock. No reply on the original changeset/155264053 in over a month. |
| 156377022 | over 1 year ago | Thanks for resolving this one Fizzie. |
| 155264053 | over 1 year ago | Hi Juveria Vasim and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
| 150341092 | over 1 year ago | Hey Map-Finder. Please use meaningful changeset comments. "updates & alignments at A7" does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 136018997 | over 1 year ago | Are you sure the poles are vents and not light posts? Have you visited this park again? I found these when looking up fix-me requests.
|
| 149167432 | over 1 year ago | Hey Swavu. Is it unnecessary to tag roundabouts with oneway? I've always ticked it as in iD when viewing the way it's 'assumed yes' but I thought it would be better to say 'yes'.
|
| 145783602 | over 1 year ago | Does the park really jut out to the north into Inverell Court? Bing and Esri only show a residential property there.
|
| 137539678 | almost 2 years ago | That article says they have a boat shed and a single classroom space. But agreed, I can't re-find any public resource that says this building is part of the TAFE so I've retagged it as a residential area in changeset/147643169. Thanks for the correction. |
| 122440619 | about 2 years ago | I referenced Energex's 'Look up and Live' map. According to them there's both 11kV HV and 415V LV lines overhead in these areas. I suppose a duplicate set of ways could be drawn for the LV lines? Or I should've put both on the one way? |
| 139701428 | over 2 years ago | Ahh rats. Cheers Jono. Fixed in this changeset: changeset/140036262 |
| 138966431 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for the tip and link nevw. I believe I've fixed the errors in this changeset: changeset/139114228 I've still got some more ungluing to do around the industrial area. |
| 133001929 | almost 3 years ago | Cheers Jono. I've corrected my mistake in changeset/133230958. Also added the art gallery inside too. I didn't realise I'd used the wrong website for the customer service centre. I've also corrected that in changeset/133231019. |
| 123719551 | about 3 years ago | Cheers for the info Scottie. I've removed the turn restrictions in changeset/128059046 |
| 123719551 | about 3 years ago | Hey Scottie. Any intersections in particular? I'm looking at node/267121617 but aerial imagery makes it look like a right-turn into the side street would be illegal. Or is that allowed now?
|
| 125724853 | over 3 years ago | Thanks nevw. I've fixed my error here: changeset/125837276 |