Starrkdave's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 112544967 | about 4 years ago | Olá António.
|
| 112544967 | about 4 years ago | Hi AntMadeira. No, they are not marked longitudinally |
| 112544967 | about 4 years ago | I agree that ER 208 is not yet a secondary road, as it is unfinished, but for the rest of the roads i mentioned I don't see how you can consider what I said to be "mapping for the render". I just say follow the guidelines as strictly as possible!
|
| 112544967 | about 4 years ago | Maibe... Is that a big problem? For example, In S. Vicente I find many roads that I feel should have their qualification "elevated". for example, ER 208 from Fajã da Cinza to until the S. Vicente Industrial Area should be a Secondary road. And "Estrada das Lombadas", that is actually called "Estrada Municipal das Lombadas" should be a tertiary instead of Minor/unclass.
|
| 112544967 | about 4 years ago | Hello Nuno.
|
| 97761134 | almost 5 years ago | you can see in this image the overlay between the original trace of the tunnel, and the actual location of the roas as per DRE
|
| 97761134 | almost 5 years ago | Hello. This tunnel had a check position tag. I found a vectorial PDF from direcção regional de estradas with all the main roads in Madeira. I overlayed it with the road location in osm, and moved the tunnel location to the correct position. Also, I find that bing aerial images for this area become very inaccurate in when the terrain is very sloped. For this reason I corrected the Ponta da areia roundabout location based on gps tracks, and the dre map. |
| 43878427 | almost 9 years ago | Hello. I can see you have added a lot of viewpoints with the designation IP...
|