Is there really a disused rail line north of here (that then forks both east and west). It's possible, but somewhat unlikely - needs a proper survey.

There are some untagged and some duplicate features here (try osm.org/#map=19/27.15017/87.24251&layers=ND to see them). What are they and what should they be tagged as?

There's some sort of farm shoppy thing in one of these two buildings. What exactly is it and what is it called?

The bridleways south of here partially duplicate the existing service road. Are they signed "public bridleway"? If so remove the parts of the new bridleways where they duplicate the service roads and add "designation=public_bridleway" to the appropriate parts of the service roads.

Here way/316657178 seems to be a duplicate of part of way/316528733 , which is surely wrong.

Also the "motorroad=yes" tag seems unlikely in Nepal (even if highway=primary is valid in this mountainous region, which seems unlikely).

There are two farms named "Butterley Farm" here (to the southwest and northeast). Both have been tagged based on signage, but need to recheck because of the obvious duplication.

What time does this open? A recent changeset comment says that the cafe at node/3230697001 is open every day until 14:00, but when does it open? Does it open 7 days a week?

There are some duplicate "localities" here node/2899977546 and node/2899955722 are both allegedly "Caythorpe Low Fields". To the east are node/2899955724 and node/2899955725, allegedly "Fulbeck Low Fields". In reality I suspect both of these places (if they exist at all on the modern world) are areas rather than point locations, and the mapper has just copied text from OS_OpenData_StreetView without thinking at all about what it represents.

I'm not convinced that the farmland to the west of the ridge such as way/319041308 is really "meadow". When I was last there it just looked like part of the rest of the local farmland (some arable, some with animals on it).

Is way/315901396 really a river? As mapped it seems to flow uphill into the village, around, and then down again, which is surely wrong.