OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

SomeoneElse's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by SomeoneElse

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
244596 SomeoneElse

Is this still best described as a pub? The main signage on the A52 describes it as a cafe; the website as a hotel, bar, and caravan site. Need to visit to find out whether it's best mapped as one thing (and if so what) or several.

247052 SomeoneElse

This footpath needs a proper survey. Presumably it joins Bowling Alley Lane, but exactly how (stiles, gates, etc.) needs to be discovered.

247056 SomeoneElse

The footpath that runs south of here needs a proper survey. It seems to get through hedges without using stiles or gates, and runs right through at least one farmhouse. It probably also joins the road here rather than the landuse.

247061 SomeoneElse

I'm guessing that the two bridleways here are actually one and the same, and the actual place where it joins the road is around where this marker is. Needs survey.

247059 SomeoneElse

Need to survey to see exactly how this footpath joins the road here (stiles, gates, etc.)

247064 SomeoneElse

As drawn, this footpath is clearly rubbish. I suspect that from the west it actually joins the stub to the northeast of here, rather than connecting to the wrong side of the bridge.

249290 SomeoneElse

Need to have a look to see how the (mostly artificial?) north-south channel interacts with the natural east-west streams. Does it act as some sort of load balancer, or a feeder for something else?

260477 SomeoneElse

Presumably this footpath joins the main road, but does it go right past the pub or into the car park first?

267395 SomeoneElse

Presumably the footpath from the south here joins the path to the north of it? You can't see from the imagery because of tree cover, but it seems pretty likely.

271666 SomeoneElse

way/24512612#map=19/53.42937/-1.98834&layers=N needs a survey southwest from here to see exactly how it joins. The paths southeast and northwest I've aligned from GPS traces, but way/24512612 doesn't obviously match a ground feature and there are no underlying traces.