I've since had a look around here, and it's not feasible to get through (in June, on foot). Grass and scrub is about 3 feet high. Nothing is signed, no indication of anyone having used the path.

For info this has just been mentioned again at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH , for much of the same reasons as discussed at changeset/71619765 including "doesn't seem to match what's actually there". I'm several thousand miles away and am therefore not in a good place to judge how good or otherwise it is, but am happy to help with a revert if that is thought to be the best route forward.

Hello,
I think that the ways that have been added to the Trans-Pennine Trail have accidentally gone into the wrong relation. They've been added to relation/4139041 , which is a "superroute" - a relation that contains other relations as members. I suspect that the should be added either to the Leeds-Wombwell section relation/10508149 or to a new relation which forms a spur up to Pinders Heath - assuming that that spur was deliberate and was not created by accident by iD extending existing cycleways that happened to be relation members.
I'm not familiar with the TPT here, but would be more than happy to help fix it if necessary.
Best Regards,
Andy.

Bonjour,
Le balisage de relation/2475084 est erroné. Seulement un tiers environ est l'A1, le reste est l'A9. Aucun des A1/A9 n'a un _nom_ de A1 ou A9. Notez également que de manière générale, aucune route E au Royaume-Uni n'est signalée. De manière générale, si les routes ne sont pas signées, nous ne les ajoutons pas à OpenStreetMap. Si vous insistez pour le faire, vous devez préciser que ces itinéraires ne sont pas balisés. Changer "ref" en "unsigned_ref" semble être le moyen le plus populaire de le faire ; J'ai également utilisé ref:signed=no et name:signed=no pour cela dans le passé. Si vous avez des questions, n'hésitez pas à demander!
Meilleures salutations,
Andy

Hello,
The tagging of relation/2475084 is wrong. Only about a third of it is the A1, the rest is the A9. None of the A1/A9 has a _name_ of A1 or A9. Also note that generally speaking no E roads in the UK are signed. Generally speaking if routes aren't signed we do not add them to OpenStreetMap. If you insist on doing so you should make it clear that these routes are unsigned. Changing "ref" to "unsigned_ref" seems to be the most popular way to do this; I've also used ref:signed=no and name:signed=no for this in the past. If you have any questions, please ask!
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
It looks like http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=346129277 isn't quite there yet - change:lanes and turn:lanes still look like they might have information from before they were merged in error.
I've reverted quite a few of these (see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html ) but I've not done this one because you've already mostly tidied it up.
Best Regards,
Andy

Also a few lit streets in York

Footpaths near Chop Gate, from survey

More Bilsdale, footpaths etc. from survey

I've changed
relation/5803817/history
OK

And checked the following:
relation/12474062
relation/12469931
relation/12461262
relation/11622230
OK

relation/11622228
OK After removing some other stragglers

relation/11622227
relation/11622218
relation/11622215
relation/11622214
relation/11282825
relation/10928787
relation/10926299
relation/10926298
relation/7063585
relation/7062710
relation/7058519
relation/7034764
relation/6929199
relation/6928939
relation/6928005
relation/6166997
relation/5803912
relation/5803817
relation/5595242
relation/5537914
relation/5300514
relation/4085165
relation/283732
relation/278664
OK

Checking the others:
6166995
5595242
10926299
OK

Finally, checking other relations on
way/372440830/history
No, check
way/955984584

Relation Dunfanaghy Superintendent Registrars District (11622228) (as outer)
Relation Dore (5537914) (as outer)
Relation Magheraclogher ED (12469931) (as outer)
Relation Annagary ED (6929199) (as outer)
Relation Dunfanaghy Poor Law Union (11622227) (as outer)
Relation Tullaghhobigly Parish (10926298) (as outer)
Relation Gweedore Registrars District (11622230) (as outer)
Relation Tullaghobegly (6166997) (as outer)
Relation Annagary ED (12461262) (as outer)
Relation Dunglow Registrars District (11622218) (as outer)
Relation Kilmacrenan (5803912) (as outer)
Relation Glenties Superintendent Registrars District (11622215) (as outer)
Relation Glenties Poor Law Union (11622214) (as outer)
Relation Magheraclogher ED (6928005) (as outer)

All these have been checked above.

Actually the second part - the first part was changeset/106300014 .

Just checking - are you sure way/177187768/history is Kwartel Street? Because there's one just to the west...

Hello,
As mentioned previously on changeset/106425749 it'd be great to know what is actually happening here. Changeset comments should explain a little bit about what you're mapping; you're here doesn't say anything at all. Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello JOYCE MARY_imports,

Thanks for your updates, but it'd be great to know what is actually happening here. Changeset comments should explain a little bit about what you're mapping; you're here doesn't say anything at all.
Can you explain why you deleted these buildings?
Best Regards,
Andy

Բարև քոչվոր հայերեն
Խնդրում ենք օգտագործել փոփոխությունների շտեմարանները, որոնք բացատրում են, թե իրականում ինչ եք փոխել և որոնք են ձեր աղբյուրները: Տե՛ս osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
Հարգանքներով
Էնդի

Hello Nomadic Armenian,
Please use changeset comments that explain what it was that you actually changed and what your sources were. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy

I notice that node/2669903811/history was deleted in changeset/105728891 . Should it be restored? Let me know if it should.

It's been suggested that "LIL" is "Lycee International de Londres" (way/465874035) and SNT is "Sciences Numeriques et Technologiques".
I think that OSM is covered by the SNT curriculum in France.

Hello GuerinetOscarSNTLIL, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You've added this as a "place of worship" when it looks just like a house. If you edit it with the online editor, and click on "Place of Worship" at the left, you can search instead for "house" and it'll change it.

Also, as added you've included the garden. In OSM a house should only include the actual building.

Best Regards,

Andy

PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

Hello,
Andy from the OSM's Data Working Group here.
I'm currently trying to repair the road merge problems described at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html and noticed that the tags on http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=79636644 seem implausible. "lanes=4;2;3" has clearly been merged from several previous ways. Please check the historical data using overpass when you see tags like this.
Best Regards,
Andy