This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

Actually, are you sure that you always used DigitalGlobe? There are references to Google Maps in various changesets:

c38805497.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google Maps ZENRIN 2016"/>
c38850715.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google maps"/>
c38994092.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google maps"/>
c38994092.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google maps"/>
c38994092.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google maps"/>
c58326553.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google Maps"/>
c60292354.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google Maps"/>
c60339531.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google Maps street view 10/2015"/>
c60556790.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google Maps 2018"/>
c60724429.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google Maps Aug 2017"/>
c60778875.osc: <tag k="source" v="Google Maps Aug 2017"/>

(the "c" number is the changeset number).

Regards,
Andy

Hello NG Apparels,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. way/188183372 was added here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. However, given your account name I presume it's actually your shop - in that case "local_knowledge" would be a perfectly good source for OSM.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hallo SuperTenere

Ich hoffe, es macht Ihnen nichts aus, wenn ich nach etwas frage, das vor sechs Jahren zu OpenStreetMap hinzugefügt wurde. way/343683006 wurde hier mit dem Tag "source = Google Maps" bearbeitet. Wir können das nicht als Quelle in OSM verwenden, da die Google-Lizenz die Verwendung hier nicht zulässt. Wenn es sich um einen Ort handelt, mit dem Sie tatsächlich vertraut waren, ist "local_knowledge" eine perfekte Quelle für OSM.

Wenn nicht, müssen wir von Google stammende Elemente entfernen, die Sie zu OSM hinzugefügt haben.

Freundliche Grüße,

Andy Townsend im Namen der Datenarbeitsgruppe von OSM

Hello SuperTenere

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap six years ago. way/343683006 was edited here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hallo jg16

Ich hoffe, es macht Ihnen nichts aus, wenn ich nach etwas frage, das vor vier Jahren zu OpenStreetMap hinzugefügt wurde. way/192750147 wurde hier mit dem Tag "source = Google Maps" bearbeitet. Wir können das nicht als Quelle in OSM verwenden, da die Google-Lizenz die Verwendung hier nicht zulässt. Wenn es sich um einen Ort handelt, mit dem Sie tatsächlich vertraut waren, ist "local_knowledge" eine perfekte Quelle für OSM.

Wenn nicht, müssen wir von Google stammende Elemente entfernen, die Sie zu OSM hinzugefügt haben.

Freundliche Grüße,

Andy Townsend im Namen der Datenarbeitsgruppe von OSM

Hello jg16

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap four years ago. way/192750147 was edited here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hallo Hendric Stattmann

Ich hoffe, es macht Ihnen nichts aus, wenn ich nach etwas frage, das vor fünf Jahren zu OpenStreetMap hinzugefügt wurde. way/389495533 wurde hier mit dem Tag "source = Google Maps" bearbeitet. Wir können das nicht als Quelle in OSM verwenden, da die Google-Lizenz die Verwendung hier nicht zulässt. Wenn es sich um einen Ort handelt, mit dem Sie tatsächlich vertraut waren, ist "local_knowledge" eine perfekte Quelle für OSM.

Wenn nicht, müssen wir von Google stammende Elemente entfernen, die Sie zu OSM hinzugefügt haben.

Freundliche Grüße,

Andy Townsend im Namen der Datenarbeitsgruppe von OSM

Hello Hendric Stattmann

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap five years ago. way/389495533 was edited here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset/103327834.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105078961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a source=google changeset in London. See changeset/103327834.

Previous versions now redacted. The road layout is as clear as day on Bing imagery, so just remove name here.