It really isn't impossible to say _something_ . IF it helps, have a look at mine: @SomeoneElse/history and @SomeoneElse2/history - many of the changes there are "the same sort of thing" as previous ones, but it's still possible to add a bit of information.

Olá toplusitânia,
OpenStreetMap é um projeto compartilhado no qual temos que trabalhar juntos.
Você precisa pedir desculpas a DiogoBaptista98 pelo que disse acima.
Caso contrário, tomaremos outras medidas.
Atenciosamente,
Andy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados do OSM

Hello topolusitania,
OpenStreetMap is a shared project that we have to work on together.
You need to apologise to DiogoBaptista98 for what you said above.
If you don't, we will take further action.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Привіт Алекс,
Енді з робочої групи даних OSM тут. Ми отримали декілька повідомлень від людей, які також займаються картографуванням в Україні, у яких говориться, що було б чудово, якби ви щоразу використовували фактичні коментарі до набору змін, а не просто «-». Будь ласка, спробуйте сказати щось - це допоможе іншим картографам.
З найкращими побажаннями,
Енді

Hello Alex,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. We've received a couple of messages from people also mapping in Ukraine saying that it'd be great if you were to use actual changeset comments not just "-" every time. Please do try and say something - it will help other mappers.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello DUGA,
OpenStreetMap is a joint project that we all work on together. Sometimes we make mistakes - I do, and I suspect that you probably do too. A comment like the one you made here on a 3-year-old changeset by a user with only 34 edits to their name because they accidentally misspelt "chapel" makes you look like a bit of a dick.
Perhaps you ought to consider apologising?
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

Hello 5HAD0W@Brighton&Hove, and welcome to OSM!
I'm not sure what change you were trying to make here (and as you can see from https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/12709957 , someone has already reverted it).
This station has had "usage=tourism" on it for 10 years or so, so no map that is actually bothered about it is going to mistake it for a mainline station.
See e.g. just up the line at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#20/54.43633/-0.72513 - you can see the mainline station in blue, and the NYMR one in brown.
Best Regards,
Andy

Looks like the actual change to https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/5075987456 (the "stop position" for Northern's station here) was to just remove network and operator tags added in changeset/145930795 .
Just mentioning this as a FYI for anyone stumbling across it - the single platform "stop positions" on the national rail network are essentially a work of fiction. The station node/2246553747 already has network and operator on it.

survey 07/1/2/204, ts0576b

Survey 6/1/2024, ts0573c

I've now updated how far it goes back in way/424412503

It may be just a genuine mistake - if you look at https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/3795586 and changeset/144117245 you can see that I forgot to change the name back there.

What I forgot to change here was the name, For the benefit of anyone reading this in English, the wikipedia pages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Crimea (Russian) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_Republic_of_Crimea (Ukrainian) may help to explain.

We did ask whether there was any on-the-ground justification for a current name:ru here, but didn't receive any reply on that.
To contact the DWG about this either comment here or email [email protected] with a subject of "[Ticket#2023111310000152] [OpenStreetMap] way/239299960".

At relation/1761919#map=20/53.77466/-1.02201 The TPT is signed for cyclists NE and for pedestrians SE. "Camino Ingles to Santiago" followers (mainly foot) are signed along the cycle route.

Going eastbound, the explicitly signed "cycle TPT" starts at relation/1761919#map=19/53.77773/-1.02742 (the sign as at the eastern end). NCN65 is also signed over the same route, but the signs are not all in the same places.

Sveikas Tomai,
Ar galite paaiškinti, kodėl čia pasakėte „ne, ne tavo sritis“?
Geriausi linkėjimai,
Andy Townsendas, OSM duomenų darbo grupės vardu.

Hello Tomas,
Can you explain why you said "no, not your area" here?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Thanks - done in changeset/145817976

My recollection is that this is artificial turf, yes.