SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 141931434 | over 2 years ago | Hello Orkhan17,
|
| 141692468 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for filling in the gap here. There are quite a few more that you can see at http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=85775 . I'm guessing that they predate your editing of it; I'm just mention it here because I bet you can fill in some of the other gaps! |
| 141697670 | over 2 years ago | For waymarks see image links from node/11216196019 and node/11216175282 |
| 141697670 | over 2 years ago | I've removed the fixme from relation/3318993 the Harcamlow Way that had said "no waymarks" since there _are_ now waymarks for at least part of this. |
| 121852091 | over 2 years ago | Thanks! |
| 141566074 | over 2 years ago | @GPSMAP67 You have now promised again (by OSM PM) not to edit way/1086252957. You did this previously on 30/05/2023 and then broken that promise just now.
|
| 141162853 | over 2 years ago | Again, I'd suggest to both sides of this argument that a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org (with photos attached!) would be far more productive than tit for tat complaints to the DWG. |
| 141400713 | over 2 years ago | Also ts0196a and ts0197b, Beningbrough |
| 141338929 | over 2 years ago | Re "Apparently someone did the ground work and has visited the site" they clearly didn't notice that the POI was in the middle of the road :)
|
| 141263403 | over 2 years ago | Hello Rockedf,
|
| 139498692 | over 2 years ago | That sounds very much like an organised editing process. Can you please read https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines and make sure that you follow it? |
| 141338929 | over 2 years ago | Clearly the POI here is rubbish. The location is in the middle of the road! It's clear that the business owner accepts bitcoin, at least according to her website https://w4lkies.com/ . What is NOT clear is whether this is actual a physical business that is mappable in OSM at all.
Have you actually visited this location and verified that there is a physical business location here? |
| 141162853 | over 2 years ago | Re "how come you keep blindly demanding explanations in my change sets" then the reason is because the DWG is getting continual complaints. I'm not in Luxemburg and can't judge how much merit they have or not; that's way it'd be great to have photo evidence of some of these (and thanks for providing that in the past). |
| 140106715 | over 2 years ago | Thanks! |
| 140342133 | over 2 years ago | Hallo,
|
| 140342133 | over 2 years ago | Hello,
|
| 32502463 | over 2 years ago | Re "someone should do a thorough review" you might want to mention it at community.osm.org or in OSM US' Slack so that more people are aware of it.
|
| 141012502 | over 2 years ago | I've hidden the spam link. |
| 138964092 | over 2 years ago | Changesets by this user are: id
|
| 138964092 | over 2 years ago | The revert here was done via the perl revert scripts, which turned out to be not fast enough to deal with the issue, hence other methods being used for the problems through August (this was a very early case of that vandalism). If you look at https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/759814358 for example you can see that many different accounts subsequently vandalised the ways affected here. |