Hallo fkv,
Die goldene Regel von OSM lautet: Wenn Ihnen viele Leute sagen, dass Sie falsch liegen, dann liegen Sie wahrscheinlich falsch.
Hier deutet https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1021250484 darauf hin, dass in diesem speziellen Argument niemand auf Ihrer Seite ist.
Wenn Sie immer noch der Meinung sind, dass Sie Recht haben, führen Sie die Diskussion bitte zu https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/at/59.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Andy Townsend von der Datenarbeitsgruppe von OSM.

Hello fkv,
The golden rule of OSM is that if lots of people are telling you that you are wrong, you probably are.
Here https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1021250484 suggests that there is no-one on your side in this particular argument.
If you _still_ think that you are correct, please take the discussion to https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/at/59 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello Andrew Saunders, and welcome to OSM.
I'm a bit surprised that this path is not signed as closed in any way, given that there was a previous discussion over at changeset/135290950 where some National Trust people said that they were trying to close it. You wouldn't happen to have taken any photos while you were there recently? I've asked the same question over on the NT changeset.
Best Regards,
Andy

For info, osm.org/user_blocks/7272 .

Thanks!

Oddly, someone thinks that this path is still open - perhaps it is worth commenting on changeset/138109479 ?
Also, photos would be great...

Cockup - My notes just say "post" for each. I've changed them.

For the avoidance of doubt, this is a revert to the state immediately before the edits - it does not mean that previous values were "correct". As an example, I'd expect that way/1184324514/history would have names in both Ukrainian (name:uk) and Russian (name:ru), and that the "name" tag would follow the rules set out in https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .

See osm.org/user_blocks/7240 for why this data was reverted. See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/100629/21 and the following comments.

Thanks!

Thanks

Thanks

Thanks!

Hello node/6800626687 has "wheelchair=yes;no" on it. If it's accessible from one side I'd have expected "yes"?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
It looks like there's been a problem merging things into node/4735935534/history as it now has "wheelchair=no;yes".
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
I was wondering how to interpret the "wheelchair" = "nolive_music=yes" tag on Upstairs @ Ronnie's here?
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
I'm guessing that the wheelchair tag on way/1159243300 should perhaps be a width?
Regards,
Andy

Should the wheelchair tag on node/9649547673 perhaps be a source tag?

Hello,
Poundland node/10687900249/history has "wheelchair=t" on it. Is that a yes or a no, or something else?
Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I've changed node/9921540891 from wheelchair=partial to wheelchair=limited, which I presume is what was meant here?
Regards,
Andy