OpenStreetMap
SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 130784775 | about 3 years ago | For the avoidance of doubt, it's not signed as "Upper Heyford" (a previous made-up name) either. |
| 115225228 | about 3 years ago | No idea what the "man_made=standing_stone" such as node/9356645968/history are like here - are they like any of the first four stones at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/-25.00734/135.17517 ? If so, I can detect them as one category or another.
|
| 130423281 | about 3 years ago | Thanks! |
| 130654359 | about 3 years ago | ਸਤ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਅਕਾਲ,
|
| 130654359 | about 3 years ago | Hello,
|
| 128221809 | about 3 years ago | Hello,
|
| 128147052 | about 3 years ago | Thanks - I've moved the tags over (and removed the building tag) and removed the old site relation. As you say, nothing really understood it. |
| 101850940 | about 3 years ago | See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-December/066664.html for links to the background. As osm.wiki/Proposal_process makes clear, "a vote result is never permission for large-scale re-tagging of existing objects". The use of maproulette in this way is essentially an automated edit by other means. However, as I said in the list post above, it doesn't make sense to revert back to where we were many months ago.
|
| 129958453 | about 3 years ago | Hello,
|
| 121594280 | about 3 years ago | > What amended objects have reduced the quality of the OSM database? The immediate one I spotted was way/312307713 . Previously it was "leisure=pitch; sport=rugby_union". The extent of the rugby pitch was mapped by me from the Bing imagery the day before your changeset here, based on a survey earlier in the month. Even if you thought the imagery was unclear it's pretty obviously a rugby pitch - it's named after Laurence Dallaglio who's a famous alumnus and went on to much success with in English rugby (even if he allegedly, as the pub story goes, struggled to get in the first team at Ampleforth!) https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pqG shows that you introduced a unique tag combination in this edit. I asked "Can you explain what you actually did?". You replied "The changeset was open for over an hour ... restricted to not cross borders, bodies of water or continents", none of which answered the question, so: Can you explain what you actually did? |
| 121947395 | about 3 years ago | Hello,
|
| 82489643 | about 3 years ago | Hello,
|
| 121594280 | about 3 years ago | Actually it was checking the data that got me to this changeset :)
|
| 121594280 | about 3 years ago | What logic did you use to "Convert large pitches into recreation grounds"? It sounds very much like a mechanical edit that should be reverted, unless you checked each feature and made sure that it really wasn't a pitch, but was something else. |
| 129835625 | about 3 years ago | > When I draw a line along a path on the imagery The problem is that people don't know that that is what the changeset does until they have looked at it. That is what changeset comments are for - to help people see what a changeset does without looking in detail. |
| 130439925 | about 3 years ago | Customer foot access west from the hall to Hall Lane was checked with reception. |
| 130423281 | about 3 years ago | You have said that you used "USGS Topo maps" as your source for the change to way/1033978504 . The name "Spearhead Mountain Road" does not appear on the "USGS Topo maps" that are visible within iD. Where did you see it? |
| 129835625 | about 3 years ago | You didn't though, did you?
|
| 101214312 | about 3 years ago | Bonjour,
|
| 101214312 | about 3 years ago | Hello,
|