Looking at way/968249780 , it doesn't appear to go through node/8957929769 at all but around to the east.

Now you've changed way/962302175/history from a track to a stream it makes much more sense.

Привіт, VARVAR8!
Хтось згадав way/979439523/history у DWG. Це виглядає як потік в кінці гори, але дорога або доріжка в кінці села.
Яке джерело було використано для цього?
Чи можете ви переглянути його та інші, додані в цей набір змін?
Спочатку він був доданий як трек, а потім був перетворений у потік:
way/979439523/history
З найкращими побажаннями,
Енді

Hello VARVAR8,
Someone has mentioned way/979439523/history to the DWG. It looks like a stream at the mountain end but a road or track at the village end.
What source was used for this?
Can you please review it, and any others added in this changeset?
When originally added it was as a track and was later converted to a stream:
way/979439523/history
Best Regards,
Andy

I don't think that anyone would want to revert a changeset just because one "ref" value on one relation is wrong - is anything else wrong in the changeset?
Best regards, Andy.

Re "FIXME=What the fuck are these notes supposed to mean?" on node/26057684/history , I suspect it's just a "note to self" by the original mapper

Obviously bits of the wall are implausible - like where it crosses the railway line - but the fact that most of it has a barrier round it is clear from the imagery.

Thanks.
The offset of the buildings with regard to imagery also seems a bit variable - does that also need checking?

Hello,
East of
node/8901430646/history
way/657422273
Looks like a stream flowing east.
Immediately west of there, it does not appear to exist.
North of
node/9325603090/history
It does appear to be a path.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello
way/962302175/history
Seems pretty unlikely - it is a track that "flows into a stream" way/962302171/history .
Best Regards,
Andy

Are you sure that the middle part of way/965674960 , around node/8933483933/history , actually exists? It doesn't look like it on the imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy

Either the imagery is way out here (in which case all the tracks you added are wrong) or the source for the location of node/8895886920/history#map=19/48.60168/24.15105 is very wrong.
Which is it?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
What is your source for way/961703850 west of node/8933482165 ? I can't see anything on the available imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy

Sorry - "this changeset" means changeset/107458287 not 114412123, since that was where this track was added.

Hello,
I'm struggling to see any sign of way/961703557 in available imagery (Bing, Maxar, Esri). Bing's pretty clear, and there's nothing there.
Please check this, and all other tracks added in this changeset.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
node/6194967015/history seems very unlikely. Apparently the path way/661712673 joins the stream here and then stops, but there is no connection to the tertiary road way/728214934/history just to the east. The imagery suggests that there is access west from the tertiary road, but the path south is actually fairly unclear. Bing appears to be the clearer imagery than Maxar here.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
What is your source for way/962737142 east of node/8905566343 ? That node was originally added by you.
On the available Bing imagery, there's nothing. On Maxar imagery it looks like there's some temporary logging access, but not all the way to node/8955362997/history (also added by you).
Best Regards,
Andy

Are you sure that way/962737350 actually exists east of node/8905571075 ? It really doesn't look like it from the imagery, even allowing for imagery offset in hilly areas. There is a cliff!
Best Regards,
Andy

I'm not sure that way/962737527 really counts as "residential" does it? Looks more like an unclassified road to me on the imagery.

Привіт, VARVAR8!
Чи можете ви пояснити, що ви намагалися тут зробити?
Візьмемо, наприклад, way/902349619 (нібито паркан, доданий вами в цьому наборі змін). Він проходить прямо через будівлю way/154166406 востаннє відредаговано вами 3 роки тому.
Це просто дуже неякісна робота від імені Kaart чи якийсь «вироблений троль», який намагається дратувати інших картографів? Якщо це було останнє, значить, це вдалося.
Поясніть, будь ласка, як ви плануєте виправити цей безлад і за який термін.
З найкращими побажаннями,
Енді Таунсенд, від імені робочої групи з даних OSM