For info - this has been reverted in changeset/27962131 .

Thanks - I've added note/297043 since a resuarant and a convenience store within a supermarket seems unlikely. I'll probably get the chance to walk past here a couple of times in the next couple of months; other people may get the chance sooner.

For info - you don't need to remove private drives - just add "access=private" to them so routers know to ignore tham and they get rendered properly.

How can a wiki page be a source of a worldwide edit? way/176615490/history seems to have been replaced with node/3270155765 - i.e. less detail is mapped now than was before?

Given the absence of a reply here yet, I've undeleted the missing bits of the A92 and joined the roads (and bus routes) up. See changeset/27938477 and changeset/27938325 .

If changeset/27578878 et al need to be reverted, then revert this changeset and changeset/27938325 first.

I've nudged some stuff from osm.org/#map=19/53.15511/-1.39235 down to the next footpath bridge across a bit to match the GPS traces (there are lots of them in the area).

This changeset has a huge bounding box and a relatively meaningless changeset comment ("Fixed road data"). If this comes up in the changeset history for someone, how will they know what has been changed locally to them and why?

The bounding box here is huge and the description suggests TIGER fixing only, yet way/115431481 is obviously not TIGER. Could you please (a) use smaller changeset bounding boxes and (b) use meaningful changeset comments?

FWIW I'm not familiar with the name despite having driven along here quite a bit, but seems to be a loc_name: http://www.buxtonadvertiser.co.uk/news/local/bakewell-it-was-a-joy-to-be-with-her-mum-s-tribute-to-13-bends-crash-victim-1-5605574

Please don't copy everything you see written on OS_OpenData_StreetView to OSM as a "locality".

You've added lots and lots of these, many of which are simply wrong, unverifiable, or something else entirely. See for example

note/295997
note/295994
note/295992
changeset/27906223#map=19/53.10736/-0.52970&layers=N

(but there are many others).

A locality marked on an OS map shows that something was there once, not that there is something there now. If you believed the OS the village that I live in is actually composed of 5 or more different villages/hamlets/localities. It's not - there are 2. Where something is marked (like "The Smoots" above) it's not always a locality. In this case it's signed as a street name to the south, and a proper survey would have found this. Personally I wouldn't add "locality names" from OS_OpenData_StreetView unless I've been to the area and had a look at what it might refer to (if anything). If the locality name still is in use then there'll normally be some residual information on the ground (house names, farm names, that sort of thing).

Cheers,

Andy

(sent in a personal capacity and not on behalf of the Data Working Group)

I'm not convinced that the farmland to the west of the ridge such as way/319041308 is really "meadow". When I was last there it just looked like part of the rest of the local farmland (some arable, some with animals on it).

Is node/1191523849 really a duplicate of way/319789929 since they're in the same building? Where does node/1191523856 fit in?

Please don't add test data to the live OSM server, even in the middle of the Atlantic. If you want to test things, use http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org instead.

Hi - just wanted to check that the lane tags on the Sheffield end of the Parkway are correct (it's been ages since I've driven up there but they look like that might be wrong). way/278094012/history looks like it's been deleted as part of a merge and way/243324912 now extends past way/320118300/history where the road splits. In both cases the "turn:lanes" tag is "through|through|slight_right". That seems to make sense up to the junction but not after it?

Hi, is node/3226287508/history really named "Embassy of Romanian" rather than "Embassy of Romania"?

Something odd seems to have happened to way/4902282/history - it's been deleted. It overlapped way/4902133 (which has very odd tags, and probably needs a proper survey to see what it is), but the tags that were on way/4902282/history aren't duplicated.

I think that it might be worth having a look here: way/313401113#map=18/55.87926/-4.22511 . That way overlaps with a siding way/118794897 but doesn't join it. It's also tracks=2; but I'm guessing that that is redundant now?

FYI I've looked at a few of these locally to me and updated the ones that definitely are deciduous and broadeaved.

way/313357371 seems to have no tags on it? Presumably it should be railway=rail?