OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
32614086 over 10 years ago

What's the source of the name Smallfield Edge at node/3649631066 ?

32678362 over 10 years ago

Haha - thanks for fixing!

31544806 over 10 years ago

@EzekielT - it's a tricky one (there are potentially lots of factors to take into account). Note that relation/2374762 is already admin_level=3, and it's even the example given in the table on osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative&uselang=en-GB#admin_level . International boundary discussions tend to happen in http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=29724 , and there's also a tagging mailing list thread currently https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-July/thread.html#25676 .

32589668 over 10 years ago

Are you sure that the operator of node/700644562 really is T-Mo? I can't speak for the US, but in the UK some T-Mo shops used to be run on behalf of T-Mo by third parties. In those cases the carrier would be T-Mo but the operator someone else entirely.

32341662 over 10 years ago

The noew Waitrose node/3629920094 that you've added seems to be out in the car park, whereas just to the south of it is way/60094215 , so I suspect that you've actually added a duplicate? There shouldn't be 2 things in OSM for one thing in real life, so are you able to move your newly added details to the existing one? If not, let me know and I can do it.

32342468 over 10 years ago

For info, I've merged the details from the newly added node onto the existing way in changeset/32815430 . A couple of things that I didn't quite understand were the "cafe?=no" and "customer toilets?=no" tags. Did this mean that there really are no customer toliets or cafe (I'd have thought that a Waitrose would have both)?

32591040 over 10 years ago

In cases such as node/3630006555/history it'd be much better to contact the original mapper and explain to them what the problem with their original mapping was. The main one (which you didn't spot) was that they'd added a duplicate supermarket.

32639359 over 10 years ago

In cases such as node/3630006555/history it'd be much better to contact the original mapper and explain to them what the problem with their original mapping was. The main one (which you didn't spot) was that they'd added a duplicate supermarket.

32591221 over 10 years ago

A phone number of 509 on way/230913193/history makes no sense here! It's actually the Haiti phone country code.

32592519 over 10 years ago

Is node/2600969396 really any sort of ford? It seems to be where a footpath crosses a road, so presumably some sort of crossing? Maybe asking the original mapper or adding a map note would make more sense here?

32123560 over 10 years ago

Thanks for removing "industrial" here - it makes no sense to mistag for the "standard" renderer when there are many, many other renderings available (and you can of course create your own).

32593614 over 10 years ago

What was the source of the smoothness and surface tags on e.g. way/67273776/history here?

32725777 over 10 years ago

Are you sure that intermittent=noexit on way/101055275 really meant "=yes"? It seems pretty unlikely - a 4m wide intermittent waterway in a fairly damp part of Germany? The original mapper used intermittent=no on some and intermittent=yes on others, so I suspect that "noexit" was probably meant to mean "no" here (but either way, the width doesn't seem to make sense).

32678362 over 10 years ago

Perhaps "highway=stop" got added to the address node node/1402576111/history by mistake in Vespucci? Where should it have been added?

32755398 over 10 years ago

Given the previous tagging of way/353000458/history , would amenity=police perhaps be the correct tag here?

32767184 over 10 years ago

Are you sure that way/248615815/history is really a residential building? Previously the tags on it were somewhat contradictory, so perhaps a note here would make more sense than just removing some tags that may or may not be correct?

32767835 over 10 years ago

I've reverted this in changeset/32814810 . Some items (including way/331497978 ) are now correctly tagged again. Some may need further investigation (way/256683224 I suspect is an amenity=social_club, for example). Note that a number of outdoor seating areas in Koeln had already been corrected in changeset/32814552 and weren't changed here.

32793010 over 10 years ago

In the change to node/2668464164/history , when you say "hand edit" do you mean that you went there and surveyed it? If not, upon what basis did you make the change?

32614023 over 10 years ago

What is the source of the name "Herculean Edge" node/3649625307 here? Is it really a locality or actually a gritstone edge (one of many around here)? Has there perhaps been a convusion between "Hurkling" and "Herculean" (OSSV have the former rather than the latter, but that's no guarantee of current usage)

32697633 over 10 years ago

Re the legality of using the "Highway Capacity Manual" see http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/44294/tag-capacitynumber/44328