Thanks - I'm guessing iD perhaps did it by accident?

s/use/remove/

Did you deliberately use some of the tagging for the lifeboat station here? Data consumers did use it: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=lifeboat_station#projects .

This edit resulted in data consumers being unable to usefully use this data. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-November/030928.html .

It's clear this is a bridge based on Bing imagery

Hello ashapancake, unfortunately we can't use Google as a source, as Google's ToS don't allow us to. We'll have to revert and redact way/1008911663 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Привіт! Я повернувся way/4440279 до версії, у якій було «old_name:ru». Можливо, на ньому більше не використовується name:ru (хоча жоден із редакторів https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/4440279 цього не зробив, лише коментарі на кшталт «оновлені дані») .

Hello - I've reverted way/4440279 back to a version that had "old_name:ru" in it. It may be that there's no name:ru used on it any more (although none of the editors at https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/4440279 have made the case, just comments such as "updated data").

@Barroszt I agree with @muchichka_s . Your previous block was only revoked subject to you NOT making edits like this, hence osm.org/user_blocks/15429 .

Hello,
There's currently a gap in NCN45 just outside Telford's Warehouse: relation/22602#map=19/53.19308/-2.89906 . Presumably if coming from the southeast you'd turn right and then left, before cycling north?

Hello, I've filled in the gap in NCN82 at way/1227471059 - do you know if there is a kerb there?

osm.org/user_blocks/15425

I don't think your change here makes any sense at all - the previous edit was just fantasy mapping. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/potentially-problematic-edits-in-lottstetten/106514

C'mon - please engage your brain when making edits like this. Did you really think this was valid data?

C'mon - please engage your brain when making edits like this. Did you really think this was valid data?

Some of this "redrawing" is likely incomplete.

سلام،
متأسفانه، ما می توانیم از Google Earth برای ردیابی استفاده کنیم. شرایط خدمات را در osm.wiki/Google ببینید. ما باید این تغییرات را برگردانیم و اصلاح کنیم،
با احترام،
اندی تاونسند، به نمایندگی از گروه کاری داده OSM.

Hello,
Unfortunately, we can use Google Earth to trace from. See the terms of service at osm.wiki/Google . We'll need to revert and redact these changes,
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

In the case of way/69997349/history , version 19 was redacted because that changeset used Google as a source. See osm.wiki/Google et al.

Can you provide a link to the sources? It's pretty unusual for a speed limit to be raised in this way (though I can think of one similar example).