OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
6723125 over 10 years ago

Quite a lot of these nodes seem to be unused. Did any of them ever get incorporated into ways (e.g. parts of province boundaries) at all? Around node/1053815829/history there are a few that don't seem to be part of the boundary.

30837589 over 10 years ago

Any reason you've changed "historic=Martello tower" to "historic=yes" here?

30814083 over 10 years ago

While I can see the logic in using animal_boarding instead of boarding, was this change mentioned anywhere public so that people who might be using "boarding" on a map or in a data extraction get to know about it before it happens?

30832186 over 10 years ago

This has just popped up in a whodidit feed, so there's an edit local to me somewhere. How do I find out where, though? What was the self intersection and where was it?

30557777 over 10 years ago

Hi - I think that something went a bit wrong here. You've deleted lots of objects around here. Perhaps you were trying to create a map for your own use? If so, you might find something like "umap" useful - http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ . When you delete things from OpenStreetMap they are deleted for everyone, so you should only do this if they really don't exist any more on the ground. According to this forum thread http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=30941 people have tried to get in touch with you but haven't heard back. I've therefore reverted this changeset so that the deleted roads are restored - see changeset/30806377 . If you've got any further questions please don't hesitate to get in touch - you can contact the data working group by email on [email protected] and you're also encouraged to get in touch with the local community - the forum at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=46 seems like a good place to do that.

30730693 over 10 years ago

My apologies - I hadn't spotted that there the lines ahd already been split out (actually into 4, not 3 - so actually passenger_lines=3 is potentially questionable, assuming that one line isn't reserved for freight there).

30746270 over 10 years ago

Would it be possible to add _where_ the self-intersection was removed from in the changeset comment (and for new mappers' benefit, _why_ that's a problem)?

30730693 over 10 years ago

You appear to have removed "tracks=3" from way/310146771/history . Was that discussd anywhere so that people who might have been using that information were made aware of it?

30733183 over 10 years ago

What's the access here? Is parking restricted to customers of the Bowl Center, other local businesses, or genuinely free for anyone?

30627216 over 10 years ago

Just for info something went a bit wrong with node/3486992968/history - it got added at latitude 0, longitude 0 (I've since deleted it).

30706979 over 10 years ago

(continuing from changeset comment) I'm familiar with quite a few places on this list and at first glance _none_ of them appears to have a genuine Russian name. Some (e.g. Great Dunmow, Swadlincote) are little more than villages.

If there's a need to make up Russian names as a data source for something external (in this case I believe a computer game) please do that outside of OSM.

It's important because some of the places on this list (e.g. node/27160281 ) do have more than one name - Y Fenni (Welsh) and Abergavenny (English). Those are genuine, verifiable, different (not "soundalike") names for a place. To add made-up "translations" trawled from Google dilutes the genuine, valid name information currently in OSM for e.g. Abergavenny.

30670265 over 10 years ago

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I think that something's gone a bit wrong with way/334280162#map=18/53.48924/-1.14495&layers=Q - if you look at the west end of the footpath on the old railway line the junction with the A60 looks very confused indeed. Also the east end at way/334280162#map=18/53.49892/-1.11875&layers=Q doesn't seem to join anything at all? Unfortunately I can't remember myself (been a while since I've been down here).

One more question - has the new Morrisons over the road replaced way/85437105 or is way/85437105 actually the new Morrisons? I stuck a fixme on that a while ago because I wasn't sure (the car park looked too small).

25887152 over 10 years ago

No, there's a stile.

25887152 over 10 years ago

Does the path run through the gate at way/306462408#map=19/53.16429/-1.24041 ?

30528688 over 10 years ago

I've always wondered (where boundaries follow rivers) exactly how those boundaries are defined, given that rivers move? In this case is there a text description that says something like "follows the centreline of the river from blah to blah", or is it defined in terms of exact coordinates, and updated periodically when the river moves?

30425450 over 10 years ago

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just for info, the demo data that you were using with "learnosm" got accidentially uploaded to the middle of the Atlantic (don't worry - I've deleted it).

It's not your fault - see https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 for the discussion at the "learnosm" site.

30316992 over 10 years ago

For info, lots of these address points were created at "null island" at lat=0, lon=0. I've deleted them.

30317435 over 10 years ago

For info, lots of these address points were created at "null island" at lat=0, lon=0. I've deleted them.

30206050 over 10 years ago

Yes, but that part of the address ("Mott Street Industrial Estate") is the estate, not the individual unit (which is the "Unit 1" part). You've changed it so that the "housename" is "Mott Street Industrial Estate", which makes no sense.

30206050 over 10 years ago

Is this change actually correct? I'd be very surprised if each individual unit was named "Mott Street Industrial Estate" in addition to having a separate unit number.